Hi all,

FYI...  I was thrown off this form for asking some questions... I feel we're not answered by those over there. I may have been wrong but I just wanted a simple answer to the questions I asked.

Just thought I would let you all know about the video and the fourm thread or threads. The video is #708 as found here... http://youtu.be/hoqF3gjLIyI

And the forum link is here... http://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-708-free-energy-bullshit!/

-Dave Wing

Quote from: Dave Wing on January 30, 2015, 04:16:18 PM
Hi all,

FYI...  I was thrown off this form for asking some questions... I feel we're not answered by those over there. I may have been wrong but I just wanted a simple answer to the questions I asked.

Just thought I would let you all know about the video and the fourm thread or threads. The video is #708 as found here... http://youtu.be/hoqF3gjLIyI

And the forum link is here... http://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-708-free-energy-bullshit!/

-Dave Wing

Something appears to be wrong with your links. Try these:

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-708-free-energy-bullshit!/

http://youtu.be/hoqF3gjLIyI

Quote from: TinselKoala on January 30, 2015, 05:25:47 PM
Something appears to be wrong with your links. Try these:

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-708-free-energy-bullshit!/

http://youtu.be/hoqF3gjLIyI

Sorry about that.

Oh, most excellent! Thanks for the links.....

Especially since the EEVBlog led me to This Very Important Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljKX9Om7Z4s

Be SURE to watch the "reveal" which is linked from within the above video, towards the end!

Everybody here should watch these two videos, most definitely !!

Well.. Dave Wing, I have now read the entire thread at EEVblog, and watched the videos you linked and made. You were banned because the forum moderator decided you must be just a troll, winding them up, because you seemingly  failed to understand/believe/accept the many excellent and detailed explanations and answers you got from the various forum participants. I'm not sure I agree with that, perhaps you are a real seeker who just didn't understand the basics of energy/power/voltage/current relationships, or how energy on a capacitor is determined.

I think also you may  not understand that voltage is _relative_, since you seemed to be confused about why/how a battery can be charged using a circuit essentially like the diagram you posted several times, which I attach below.

There are several people on this forum who are very experienced Bedini builders. None of them has ever achieved a selfrunning device, which should be easy _if only_ the claims Bedini has made are correct. In fact, every Bedini builder has found, and will find that the total real charge on the batteries concerned will always be decreasing, averaged across all the batteries, even if the _open circuit_ terminal voltage may sometimes climb on some of the batteries. The batteries always run down eventually. And as far as I am aware, no measurement of the flywheel energy storage or actual power dissipation of a Bedini style pulse motor rotor has ever been done by the Bedini "believers". (But I have done such measurements and calculations on similar pulse motor/recharger designs). The flywheel energy storage can be quite large, and the power dissipation quite small, meaning that the rotor really doesn't take much power to run at its steady speed, and can deliver _peak power_ at a much higher rate than it takes to run it (for a short time as it slows down).

I would encourage you to re-read the EEVblog thread and take the explanations given there to heart. Give them careful consideration. You aren't going to get banned from _this_ forum, so please continue your discussion here if you like... but you will by and large get the same answers and criticisms here that you got over there, from people with similar levels of knowledge. By and large.

Again I thank you for providing the link, because the video I linked above is +highly significant+ and shows (in the "reveal") the method by which many other fakers have tried to bamboozle people into believing their impossible gadgets actually work as demonstrated.

Voltage is always relative to some reference level. In the diagram below, even though both battery terminals are called "positive", one is at a much lower "potential", i.e. voltage, than the other. So Batt3's "positive" is _relatively_ negative wrt the + terminal of Batt1, and hence current will flow normally through the load, powering it and charging the #3 battery. Beware, because it will likely _overcharge_ it with bad effects.

But then you know this already, I think...