Modern day theory and science of scalar wave technology ,explained, and experimental books and equipment to be repeated by anyone.Fully functional replica. Interactions of the potential vortex.

http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=10_Home&page=1&sublevel=0

Quote from: sadang on March 23, 2015, 04:19:40 AM
Thanks Raz for this new book about ether...

Isn't it odd that the scientific community has embraced the concept of 'quantum foam'...particles that permeate all of space and smaller than the Plank Scale dictates, but they refuse to acknowledge the word 'Aether'.
Why is this word so hated?  see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_foam

Quote from: sadang on March 23, 2015, 03:42:56 AM
More details for ordinary sheeple in the book called "Uncovering the missing Secret of Magnetism", for people unhappy with their current religion and would like something to rant about on forums, and for dogmatic skeptics like myself there are no more details.  No questions are allowed.  Only words from the Holy Book Of Jimmy will be accepted (and occasionally quotes from other scientists but we don't allow questions on those either).

FTFY

Quote from: pinestone on March 23, 2015, 08:42:58 AM
Why is this word so hated?

There is good reason to adopt new terms even if there are similarities to old terms.  Clearly there existed an idea with the label "ether" which predicted some outcomes which were false.  Introducing a modified idea with exactly the same label as a refuted idea just breeds confusion.  This can be seen in a number of branches of science and technology.

For example in microprocessor technology there was a trend to have CPUs with larger and larger instruction sets.  Sometimes for the purposes of memory density, sometimes for the purpose of orthogonality.  Like any design this approach had it's trade offs.  At some point people (David Patterson being one) designed CPU's which had much smaller instruction sets as an attempt to use the transistors that would have been used to implement instructions to implement larger register files, pipelines and multiple execution units.  As a result of removing instructions these chips also had simplified memory access modes.  These technologies were referred to as RISC.

Once the term RISC was applied to various chips people started backforming the word to refer to all sorts of CPUs.  Byte magazine once referred to the MOS6502 as "the original RISC processor" because it had fewer instructions than other modern CPUs (i.e. MC68000) However in order to do that they had to ignore that it had 128 Opcodes (The Berkley RISC I - had 32) , eight addressing modes (RISC I had two), 1 stage pipeline (RISC I had two) and only three registers (RISC I - sliding window of 78).  Opposite in almost every respect to any of the pioneering RISC technologies.

Because it means free of all and for all! Because financiers behind "the scientific mainstream" (and not only they) will do anything to delay the conceptualization of the existence of the ether among the population, ultimately even by manipulating its existence as being something belonging to the space, and not as something that defines the space itself, ie the space being a product of ether! They desperately need to maintain the concept of empty space, for only thus can shape a reality to their advantage. They are not stupid to cut their own branch under their feet!

Quote from: sadang on March 23, 2015, 09:13:52 AM
...They are not stupid to cut their own branch under their feet!

Yes!