Quote from: sadang on March 24, 2015, 01:33:05 AMAny argument you will prove they will come with their arguments.

Please prove one argument.  Whoops.  Sadang can't do that because she can't answer questions.

Quote from: Raz on March 23, 2015, 11:26:27 PM
He totally and without a doubt PROVED all his theories and patents.

What does "proved" mean in this context.  See as someone who knows something about math "prove" means something very specific to me.   To most people it appears to mean "sufficient evidence to convince me".  In which case there's no reason to go on about it.  I mean your standard of evidence is probably spectacularly low - most peoples are.

"There is no measurement is without error, hence there is no experiment without doubt." - Me

Quote from: Raz on March 24, 2015, 01:24:06 AM
.....your modern science analisys also says that helicopters should not theoretically fly(but they do).......

As an AeroSpace Engineer I know for a real verifiable fact that this statement is absolute BullShit.

I have spent YEARS working with the theory of flight (Both fixed wing and Rotors) and nowhere EVER
does it say that "helicopters should not theoretically fly".
In fact, by the end of 1st year Aero, any student understands fully how a Helicopter MUST fly given understood design parameters.


You complain that MileHigh did not read all of the Tesla books and so must be a Troll.

So are you saying that you have read all Flight theory books ? Thought not.


Since you have shown that you are are willing to make things up like the above provable example,
then we can only deduce that everything you write is made up (given no other indication otherwise).

Food for open minds:

If you were to tell someone close to you that 'there is utterly no such thing as magnetic attraction', they would inquire as to your medication or wonder what the punch line is. The very premise, from countless thousands of years past to the present, as evidenced from 'magnets' accelerating nails, iron bits, and ferrous objects to the 'magnet', and 'opposite poles attracting/accelerating towards each other', is as deeply ingrained in the human consciousness as the Sun rising in the East every morning. The ancient lie, this perceptual titanic error is as innate as breathing. As is the case, all attraction (and 'repulsion') is governed by dielectricity, not magnetism, which is the 'dielectric field' -Faraday, which in discharging, is the radiation Ether-modality we call magnetism. That magnetism is reaching out in space is not in question, however radiation only displaces things, as in the case of magnetism, causes an inductive reaction at the interatomic magneto-dielectric of ferrous objects, thereby causing dielectric coherency from magnetic displacement and resultant acceleration to the 'magnet' as the act of dielectric voidance. Radiation attracts nothing. Soon you will find out the simplex nature of the "magnet" which is powered by dielectric coherency (either I.D.C. induced dielectric coherency, or I.D.C.C. induced dielectric capacitance and coherency) and likewise you will have a clear, lucid, logical, coherent, proved understanding of magnets and magnetism that explains all observed phenomena of same.

---#---

So, as the Sun don't rise from the East at all, besides the human perceptual titanic error and conditional mental wrong concept and behavior, the same is with the magnetism. A correct interpretation in the current scientific paradigm, but a wrong one in a more expanded and deeply in the same time comprehension of the etheric nature of the Universe.

Quote from: Raz on March 24, 2015, 03:21:07 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxMHgsmlEfs

Here another thing for people to speculate without knowing how it works. Enjoy.

The title of the clip is, "How SEG: Searl Effect Generator produce electricity."  The title is misleading, just like a lot of thread titles on this forum are often misleading.

I know how it works, no need to speculate for this one:

In this clip, you are looking at a silly pulse motor that does nothing except produce heat.  Coils are pulsed on and off and that makes the rollers roll.  That's it, there is no useful output.  A simple coil pickup is placed next to the "motor" that senses some changing magnetic flux and that powers the LEDs.  The Searl claim is just nonsense, and for the last seven years the only thing that they ever demonstrate is this useless pulse motor.  It consumes electrical power and outputs zero.  When you put the LED pickup next to the "motor" only a tiny tiny fraction of the input power makes it to drive the LEDs.  The output vs. input efficiency is probably something like 1%.