Quote from: sadang on March 24, 2015, 02:11:39 PM
Food for open minds:

If you were to tell someone close to you that 'there is utterly no such thing as magnetic attraction', they would inquire as to your medication or wonder what the punch line is. The very premise, from countless thousands of years past to the present, as evidenced from 'magnets' accelerating nails, iron bits, and ferrous objects to the 'magnet', and 'opposite poles attracting/accelerating towards each other', is as deeply ingrained in the human consciousness as the Sun rising in the East every morning. The ancient lie, this perceptual titanic error is as innate as breathing. As is the case, all attraction (and 'repulsion') is governed by dielectricity, not magnetism, which is the 'dielectric field' -Faraday, which in discharging, is the radiation Ether-modality we call magnetism. That magnetism is reaching out in space is not in question, however radiation only displaces things, as in the case of magnetism, causes an inductive reaction at the interatomic magneto-dielectric of ferrous objects, thereby causing dielectric coherency from magnetic displacement and resultant acceleration to the 'magnet' as the act of dielectric voidance. Radiation attracts nothing. Soon you will find out the simplex nature of the "magnet" which is powered by dielectric coherency (either I.D.C. induced dielectric coherency, or I.D.C.C. induced dielectric capacitance and coherency) and likewise you will have a clear, lucid, logical, coherent, proved understanding of magnets and magnetism that explains all observed phenomena of same.

---#---

So, as the Sun don't rise from the East at all, besides the human perceptual titanic error and conditional mental wrong concept and behavior, the same is with the magnetism. A correct interpretation in the current scientific paradigm, but a wrong one in a more expanded and deeply in the same time comprehension of the etheric nature of the Universe.

Like usual, that's a laughable word salad.

And the ironic thing is with all of this "knowledge" I will ask you for a third time:  Please show how you can solve a practical real-world problem or demonstrate some sort of a useful or practical application with all of this "stuff."

Quote from: sadang on March 24, 2015, 02:11:39 PM
As is the case, all attraction (and 'repulsion') is governed by dielectricity

When an average person says "magnetic attraction" they mean "the attraction (or repulsion) effected through magnets".  So your desire to change the word doesn't make what the average person is saying into a lie.  Think please.

sadang,
             you've got to take in to consideration facts and start from there.
It's not possible to junk something like Schrodinger and atomic spectroscopy
so it's vital to establish a point where current thinking by the majority of
physicists is abandoned.
          All I'm trying to do is get a grip of what mr. Wheeler describing and
I'm finding it extremely difficult,
                               John.

@MileHigh
MileHigh regarded the word salad you get the same answer as TinselKoala. On the other hand plese stop asking me the same useless question: I'm not here for that! I'm here to emphasize the Ken's work because I agree with it more than 80%. The practical things will come in time. When? From where or whom? I don't know! Everything is possible!

---#---

@John
The Schrodinger equation and also the atomic spectroscopy are developed in an empty space paradigm of thinking. They are references in this frame of thinking, but in a space which is a byproduct of ether, things are "a bit" different. Or totally inverse? What do you think? Can you comprehend the entire ansamble? How many forms of knowledge do you know, access and use in your findings and reasoning?

Quote from: sadang on March 24, 2015, 03:32:14 PM
What do you think?

I think that clearly OU is a showcase for how little math people get taught at school.  You being a good example of this kind of intellectual impoverishment.