Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on March 30, 2015, 07:00:19 AM
I)socrates is a man.all men are mortal
II)Socrates is mortal. Does this argument have any assumptions in it
Only the author of the argument can tell you if they are making an assumption.  In one case you said
Quote from: profitis on March 28, 2015, 10:58:44 AM
I)Assuming all equilibrium gas over and underpotentials are dependant on different elemental constants
and in another
Quote from: profitis on March 29, 2015, 10:41:42 PM
I)all equilibrium gas over and underpotentials are dependant on different elemental constants

To help you out you might want to ask yourself this question:

Do I have elements in my argument which are not proved in the argument itself?

The best part of all of this is how much profitis thinks he's being clever.  :) :) :)

profitis

Sarkeizen:'Only the author of the argument can tell you if they are making an assumption.'

Is it compulsory for the author of an argument to tell the counter-arguer wether his/her argument contains assumption when asked by the counter-arguer if his/her argument contains assumption

profitis

Sarkeizen:'Do I have elements in my argument which are not proved in the argument itself?'

Is it possible to have such an argument and can you give an example of such an argument

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on March 30, 2015, 08:40:50 AM
Is it compulsory for the author of an argument to tell the counter-arguer wether his/her argument contains assumption
LOL.  Ask yourself this:  In this context, that is you are claiming you can PROVIDE a written argument which makes some point.  Can you achieve that if you do not disclose all the necessary parts of your argument? :)

For example *words* are a necessary part of your argument.  Can you provide a written argument that does not use words?

If profits danced any more this place would turn into a disco.


profitis

Sarkeizen:'For example *words* are a necessary part of your argument.  Can you provide a written argument that does not use words?'

Can you? Give an example and I'l adjust if necessary.teach me how to put you in a corner on your terms :)