Quote from: profitis on March 31, 2015, 03:02:09 PM
Sadang:'electrostatics'

Is the key to the... 'ether' indeed.

Are you talking about electrostatic like in Oleg Jefimenko electrostatic motors or an electrostatic generator??. For what I read ,Tesla used both AC and DC in his magnifier transmitter. Now if we are talking about taking a electrostatic charge or pressure and moving it in a way that interacts with the ether and brings the dielectric charge into play then I may understand you better.

Eric Dollard interview:

T: What exactly is the dielectric side of electricity? E: The side of electricity that represents the faster than light phenomenon. T: How does the dielectric relate to Reich's orgone energy? E: Reich found that the orgone and the dielectric field are basically one and the same. If a dielectric field has the proper pulsations then you could almost call it the orgone energy. An example of this is the orgone accumulator, which is alternating layers of dielectric and reflecting material, like a capacitor.

So the high voltage terminal of a properly built Tesla transmitter puts out a dielectric field? E: Right - a dielectric current - a current of many amperes flowing through free space without any electrons. This is a true electrical current.

   So , if we want to get a dielectric current or field we need pulses. And this pulses needs to be like the one's Ed Gray was producing in his motor. Just and idea.

Quote from: Raz on March 27, 2015, 06:34:20 AM
So how will you visually represent this dielectricity?? As a corpuscle like Russell said? As tubes of force? As an elemental plane between the magnetic vortex polarities? Lets say I strain the ether, by cutting lines of magnetic force with a conductor---where do the dielectricity aligns itself regarding the conductor and in which plane? and how it "flows" or "stays" in the conductor ?

Dielectricity is the fundamental field modality



they are centripetal Ether perturbations.


All centripetal counterspatial acceleration (NOT MOTION!) , including the BS dumb hairy 2-legged APES (humans) call "gravity" is DIELECTRIC counter-force (= inertia).



there are no 'conductors', only dielectric reflectors.


see this article, please , its VERY SHORT, suggest reading same.


http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjournal.borderlandsciences.org%2F1987%2Fthe-fallacy-of-conductors%2F&ei=fksbVePfOMyYNuyqhJgP&usg=AFQjCNGNIu4Oouu80iP_0GpQ0abaeIlKyg&sig2=j2tBihYObalMmFZ3LMpzKg




winks 

Quote from: Raz on March 26, 2015, 02:51:47 PM
What Lyne is trying to say

Lyne is missing MORE than a few screws from his brain-pan.     



hes generally correct, and his intent is NOBLE however.

Quote from: Raz on March 31, 2015, 09:33:57 PM
Are you talking about electrostatic like in Oleg Jefimenko electrostatic motors or an electrostatic generator??. For what I read ,Tesla used both AC and DC in his magnifier transmitter. Now if we are talking about taking a electrostatic charge or pressure and moving it in a way that interacts with the ether and brings the dielectric charge into play then I may understand you better.

Eric Dollard interview:

T: What exactly is the dielectric side of electricity? E: The side of electricity that represents the faster than light phenomenon. T: How does the dielectric relate to Reich's orgone energy? E: Reich found that the orgone and the dielectric field are basically one and the same. If a dielectric field has the proper pulsations then you could almost call it the orgone energy. An example of this is the orgone accumulator, which is alternating layers of dielectric and reflecting material, like a capacitor.

So the high voltage terminal of a properly built Tesla transmitter puts out a dielectric field? E: Right - a dielectric current - a current of many amperes flowing through free space without any electrons. This is a true electrical current.

   So , if we want to get a dielectric current or field we need pulses. And this pulses needs to be like the one's Ed Gray was producing in his motor. Just and idea.

Dollard is a total inebriated idiot!  You quote him so that tells us about your scientific search for truth, or lack thereof.  Check out his story and then get back to us once you see what it really is.  He took a lot of money and yet produced nothing....admitted he could not.

There you go.

Bill

Quote from: sadang on March 27, 2015, 08:28:04 AM
The cardinal error of science lies in shutting the Creator out of His Creation. Russell talk about modalities of ether not about particles. Tubes of force? Not really! They can be counted as a specific ether dynamics, a fundamental one, but not as dielectricity itself. Dielectricity is expressed somehow by Ken as "ether under stress or strain". I think the deep and right answer is in the book Occult Chemistry. My own view is somehow similar to what is learned now about electrostatics. Generally speaking, but do not want to get into details. That should be everyone's homework.

Now, according to my point of view the dielectricity is closer to this view "As an elemental plane between the magnetic vortex polarities" And only if we talk about polarities as a human way of saying (based on human model of thinking) not as an intrinsic reality of their nature. There is not any polarities, others than those defined by human minds. They are rather complementarities, the same as in the above image. They are simply reciprocating necessary dynamics so the ether can manifest and shape this world from micro to macro levels.

To the last question I choose to not answer, because I'm not sure about anything yet. I'm still on the road but far behind understandings of Keely, Tesla, Reich, Russell and other giants of ether science. Perhaps Ken will have a point of view here.

Anyway what you asked now sent my thoughts to the Paul Baumann experiment. However, I'll lean deep and longer on this question! Thanks for asking.

Dielectricity is what the ancient greeks called the AORISTOS DYAS

also called TOLMA (in relation to the Ether).

another name for dielectricity is  ANANKE



Dielectricity is , in short, the Demiurge.



the necessitated attribute of pure unmanifest inertia ( IE , the ETHER ITSELF IN ITSELF BY ITSELF).



as a (CRUDE) analogy, dielectricity is to the ETHER what  ILLUMINATION is to Light (the Ether itself).




There is NOTHING IN THIS COSMOS, KNOWN, UNKNOWN, SEEN, UNSEEN, SMALL, LARGE ETC ETC ETC

nothing anywhere in any form, PERIOD, that does not "have" at least one attribute.



The attribute of the Ether is dielectricity, the fundamental field modality



why say therefore then "modality"?   Why speak of (can you???) ILLUMINATION as "something (else) other than" light itself.


"as it is, as it does, inseparable, ONE THING ONLY, distinguished AS IT IS , as it "does" ....".




Just as, in IRREDUCABLE metaphysics (ala PURE GREEK LOGIC) , there is no such BS as a point.

likewise NO SUCH BS as a LINE.



point and line are both one inseparable whole, indivisible, only differentiated as one DENOTES attribute from Principle, or Principle from attribute.




divinely SIMPLEX but not simple for hairy 2-legged APES (humans) to grasp.


maybe in another 1000 years , "many" humans MIGHT grasp such simplex irreducible Field Mechanics and the logic of same.