Yet, if you watch some of the NOSE OUT clips, you can clearly see the nose
perfectly in tact.   

15 ft thick wall?   I dont think so.   Looks more about 4-5ft max.

And again,  concrete thickness is not the issue.

Its the density of the material, and how easy it is to fracture apart.

Steel beams dont fracture anywhere near the force that concrete does.

And being that the plane disintegrates with concrete only, logically
says that steel beams would have ripped it to shreds with either little
to no damage at all to the beams.   Maybe some bending from
total mass.. and the plane would be a tin can compressed fully like
a trash compactor.

Remember that plane that hit an appt building a while ago?   Do an
image search for plane crash.  The Cesna couldnt even get 3ft into
a window.   The bricks looked to be unharmed at all.   The plane
was sheared and ripped to pieces.

You have not watched all the vids, else you would clearly have
seen these facts.  Or, you have skipped thru them at points you
clearly thought were redundant.   Again, making prejudgments
based on personal feelings and opinions.

@ Zero

I said "Something flew out the side of the building and whatever it was hit #7. but a intact nose cone NO."
Another explanation would be one of the engines. However this site tries to explain it away as demolitions charges.  http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://lonelantern.org/site/images/stories/911/evidence/explosivecharges/06%2520-%2520wtc2.northeast.jpg&imgrefurl=http://lonelantern.org/site/index.php%3Foption%3Dcom_content%26task%3Dview%26id%3D20%26Itemid%3D160&start=5&h=200&w=275&sz=18&tbnid=rXbj6OzSgI4jwM:&tbnh=97&tbnw=133&hl=en&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dwtc%2B2%26gbv%3D1%26svnum%3D100%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DG

Fact is that it is part of the plane that has made it's way through the building and exited. This is what happens when you fly aircraft into buildings.    I don't see where this indicates a conspiracy from our favorite ahem administration.

The steel beams didn't fracture. Most of the flame retardant material was knocked off of the trusses the fuel quickly ignited the contents of plane and effected area's of the building. the building probably would have survived the impact had the fire not been a factor but it was.   

both tower fall because explosive inside the wall, its quite obvious when you see the tower falling, you see explosion is sequence

Quote from: TheOne on September 01, 2007, 11:00:09 PM
both tower fall because explosive inside the wall, its quite obvious when you see the tower falling, you see explosion is sequence

Not consistent enough as the building collapses to indicate sequentially ignited charges. a puff here and there doesn't constitute a finding of implosion.

http://xiaou2.homestead.com/911hoax.JPG

The above shows  Nose going in,  and coming out.

When zoomed in, and overlayed, they match in shape almost perfectly!

(From September Clues)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-472662518558193792&q=september+clues+dylan&total=2&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


And this, shows demo charges AFTER the missile hit:

http://xiaou2.homestead.com/911hoax2.JPG

If it were pressure alone, it would not be only in one spot in the center of
each side.   


The "Plane"  was digitaly added in the live broadcast via a 12+ sec delay.
Its similar to how they can insert goal lines in football now...  or insert
fake adds on the backwalls of sports arenas.   However, much more
advanced.

They Own the media.  Soon, they will OWN YOU.