Quote from: maxc on September 11, 2007, 08:44:23 PM
I heard on a good interview on coasttocoast am radio that passenger planes an be flown remotely. Can't remember who was interviewed?

Yes, you can see this inside the Loose Change video.
So maybe they just also used remore controlled commercial
airliners... but why was nothing of it in the WTC rubble

You would find of course some shrunken tail sections or
some titanium engine parts, but nothing of this was ever
shown as I know of...

Quote from: hartiberlin on September 11, 2007, 08:49:24 PM
Think about,
how many people you have "to buy" foir this complot ?
100, 200 , or 300 or 400 ?

What did they get paid for ?

Let?s say 10 people for setting up the explosives
inside the 3 WTC buildings.
Very professional demolition people,
probably dead by now or
living with a few millions in the carebean.

Some people pretending to be the family of
some people on the planes ?
Phonecalls from the Shanksville plane  where no mobile
phone can reach the mobile phone ground towers.....
with funny sentences, that could have been
generated by speech synthesis units ?

Why not just land a plane in Ohio
as Loose Change found out and
lead the passengers to a hangar and
kill them, why not, if they already choose
to kill 3000 in the towers, why not some
passengers too..
So then we have real plane families, who
cry about their loved ones, so less people
to pay for the fake.
Would be interesting to see, if some
of the Loose Change people will find
out about the plane in Ohio.

So okay, let?s say, the other 2 planes were
also redirected...and passenger killed.
So probably only another 10 people max
who did the killing ?
Okay, how many radar controllers would have be to be paid ?
Not many, as in one video was said, not many were at
their places.....

So I guess , if you put it all together really
professional, as it has been done more
or less, you could pull this off with less
than 150 paid people...

And you conclude all this because the color of the planes on some videos didn't quite match up?  Now let me see, someone orchestrated this massively risky and complex plot, but they neglected to make the fake planes the same color from one video to another?

Have you considered that maybe the colors just look funny from one video to another?  Two TVs often display a different shades when tuned to the same program.  Maybe the video camera settings were different?  I am not asking you to concede anything, because I have no hope of this, but is it even remotely possible that there is nothing sinister about the plane colors not matching up exactly?

I think you believe in this stuff because you want to.  Have you really evaluated the conflicting evidence?  Honestly?  Or do you just read what supports your point of view and delete everything else from your mind, and in my case, from the forum?

Quote from: maxc on September 11, 2007, 08:44:23 PM
I heard on a good interview on coasttocoast am radio that passenger planes an be flown remotely. Can't remember who was interviewed?

Also he said that all passenger planes can be destroyed with a push of a button if need be.

This is just stupid. I don't get why everyone has to attack people who are questioning. "It's wrong to question the government! They know what's right!" Bla Bla Bla, same crap. You can question and not pick a side. It's quit simple, these were visible observations, and probability says that any plane will disintegrate from a steel building. There was a fully intact nose cone in the videos, this contradicts known observation. Simple as that.

all the passengers was probably elite peoples that was working on some black project, what a good reason to say x peoples killed in a crash when no one is found, this guys are probably living in one of the big underground complex around the world or on the moon base!