Quote from: i_ron on August 30, 2016, 11:09:27 AM
snip....
Sound good? Good, then we won't go into my relationship with Thane or Matt, LOL
Ron

LOL. I do remember you and I, and a few others, apparently being a thorn in the side of a certain TH.
But I don't actually remember any meanness from either of us. (Maybe I'm being selective, LOL) Though I do remember myself and yourself and a few others copping a lot of flak, and obfuscation from the other side of the opinion divide. 

From memory, Nali hammered the final objective nail on the subject at hand.

Glad to see you're still actively tinkering. I've not done much tinkering with anything in the past few years, too busy earning a living, too tired during time off to get motivated.

I'm currently working two low paid part time jobs. Worst pay ever. Ironically, they are the best jobs I've ever had for earning that feeling of personal fulfillment. I started doing community and disability support work a few months ago, after doing the coursework and getting the qualifications needed. Shifts are short, many, with varying localities and times. And I'm loving it. Never a dull moment, with characters galore.

Cheers Ron... and keep on keepin' Ron!

Quote from: Erfinder on August 31, 2016, 02:08:06 PM
snip...
The majority only consider "recovery", (kickback, the spike) the sequential effect of a well understood cause.  They are oblivious to the simultaneous aspect of recovery because those who provided them with that which they possess didn't tell them about the simultaneous aspect of recovery.
snip...
Regards

@Erfinder
Just to clarify my own thoughts again, would it be fair to say that you may be alluding to the transformer effect outlined in 'Fig 19'.?
I think I'm thinking in the same general direction as you, as I re-visit the past, but I am still not really sure if we're on the same page yet. I may need a few lines drawn in for me. 
Cheers
Note* If people think I'm being cryptic, I'm simply referring to a diagram 'Fig 19' that I posted on a blog years ago regarding Adams motors.
For those who may be curious about what I'm alluding to, here's a link. It may or not contain info relevant to Erfinders current work, but you may still find it interesting to your own works re-pulsed motor-generators.
Go to page six. Scroll down to Fig 19.
http://hoptoads.5gbfree.com

Quote from: Erfinder on September 01, 2016, 06:20:20 AM
I remember that.....No, while I am referring to transformer action, I am not applying it like you are.  There are two key differences between what you are suggesting and what I am doing.
One, I prefer mosfets.....you know why......
Two, the second winding should not be rectified in this manner.....regardless of negative associations.
Regards

Cheers. Thanks for the lines! There's probably going to be a big time lag between me absorbing fresh information and actually putting it into practice . LOL Somebody hold that bus, I'm running late, again!

Quote from: Erfinder on September 01, 2016, 07:28:32 AM



Nope I haven't but I did build an air core, single phase, pulsed DC machine which exhibits the same phenomena that he references here:


https://youtu.be/HK3JOlY0V8Y?t=2520


I completely support the idea that beat frequency generation is involved here.  Of all that he is demonstrating, this concept has the most promise in my opinion, especially as it relates to air core systems.




Regards

So his latest motor draws 19 amps at 100 volts,and has no load on it.
So we have a 1.9Kw noisy heater--thats fantastic 

Can anyone point me in the direction of any efficiency tests that Jim Murray has done on any of his machines ?,as i cant seem to find just one.

Sad times indeed to see so many bright minds being hoodwinked.



Brad

Quote from: Erfinder on September 01, 2016, 09:56:59 AM

Motoring and generating are always taking place at the same time.  So far I have only mentioned the simultaneous-sequential nature of cause and effect as it applies to recovery.  I have not said anything regarding motoring and generating proper.  Were I to agree with you, I would be saying nothing you don't know already.  The generation that you are familiar with, the one operating inside your motor winding, is not being harvested.  Can it be harvested? 



Lenz offered us a way to look at things, that's it.  We can choose to follow his lead, or we can blaze our own trail guided by his suggestion.  I practice the latter. To truly neutralize the effect that Lenz has on your system you simply need to comprehend what he's saying.  I suggested that beat generation is the solution, it says it all, when you recognize what's being said, when you comprehend what's being implied.  Murray said the motor would need 1500v to run without the caps.....I know why the amperage shot up, cause I built a machine that does the same thing.  The resident basher says it's stupid....and this only because he don't get it, he only sees a heater......  My god, some (one in particular) are so blind, and you people put these folks in charge.....




Regards

Looks like the ignore function is broken
Who are !you! people,and who is the folks in charge?.

How is Jim Murray's motors and generators coming alone--i mean,it has been !how many! years now ?

Look at the title of the video
Man Solves Tesla's Secret To Amplifying Power By Nearly 5000%

Another lie,and a great insult to a great man(Tesla)

Jim Murray has solved nothing,as is evident in his video
Amplifies power by nearly 5000%-->another lie. He dose not even have a motor or generator that operates at 95% efficiency.
All he has so far is !nothing!

And another mis-direction on Murrays behalf
We have 55 foot pounds of torque,and only drawing 2.28 amp's of current 

What is torque without motion?
What is amp's without voltage ?

How can you promote rubbish like this Erfinder,and still sleep at night.
Do you not have the slightest bit of respect for the fellow members that are following you ?.

So many of them were on the right track,and now they are being pulled into the bottomless pit of nothingness--by you.

Sleep well


Brad