Quote from: forest on September 02, 2016, 01:20:50 PM
What if the beat frequency is put into parallel resonant tank circuit ?

Hey Forest - You're quite right!

Several examples come to mind immediately: Kromrey Converter, John Bedini's G-Field Generator, Witts Fueless Generator, the QEG (Based on the Wits Device), Jim Murrays What ever machine

All devices except, the Kromrey Converter and John Bedini's G-Field Generator uses LC Tank Resonance to bring about this effect, which as Brad said creates Slip in these motors. If you like Speed relative reluctance on the Rotor.

But why, no one has looked into this further, why not?

The Fields, two of them at least, separately, Buck each other. There is a Timing and a relative level of Mutual Inductance between these Coils. As Coil Current, in the Tank, goes High, the Input Current is going Low in Time, each Field Bucks and thus the Noise.

Like I said, my Electric Motor Experience is poor, I have not spent much time experimenting with motors. I have studied this effect and experimented with it. I most certainly was not able to get any OU from my work on these motors. In-fact, as Brad said, my efficiency's were very low.

But, not to say these devices don't work, just mine were not very efficient. I most certainly am not here to shoot others work down just because I was not able to achieve a result.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: I should point out, in a different System, where one can adjust the relative Timing, then these Fields can give very different results. As we have seen for some time now: Action, Reaction, and Counter-Reaction

Quote from: EMJunkie on September 13, 2015, 07:52:03 PM

P.S: Why is Three the Magic Number? Action, Reaction and Counter-Reaction... Newton's Laws of Motion...

P.P.S: Did you see that? See the clear difference:

Quote from: Erfinder on September 02, 2016, 02:54:46 PM

Find the most simple means of generating one first.  No caps, its easier than you think, or have been led to believe....


Regards

Can you feel that? Yep, Erfinder has been Owned Again!!!

Quote from: Kator01 on September 02, 2016, 04:47:20 PM
I hate to do this, but I must remind you, ron,  that you started to take sides and polarised this topic when I posted my doubts ( reply #210) about the " we can " Vid by erfinder. You even posted this here in reply #214:

"What you two have done is kill an interesting thread. I would like to have seen where he was taking us."

So now the truth starts shining through this veil of illusion erfinder was trying to establish in order to distract attention from the topic of this thread.

By the way - to mention Keshe as an argument is the worst you can do to yourself after all we know now about this guy:

http://www.keshefacts.org/
  https://keshefacts.wordpress.com/2016/03/
Mike

I guess you are right! At that time I was coming in on erfinders side... now I am coming in on Brad's side. Confused by the ongoing virulence? you could say so


However I stand corrected on Duff and Keshe. Thanks for the heads up! I knew Alex was and a certain energiser club but that was news to me. However I stand by the sentiment of the quote that I posted. To justify that, it is my opinion that these false fronts often sprinkle their work with actual facts to try and make it believable. Then it just becomes a matter of winnowing out the chaff.


Ron

@tinman

QuoteOK AC,here is your challenge.[/size]Show me any device that gains energy by way of this !so called! beat frequency phenomena .I would also advise both your self and Erfinder to put forward your description of what beat frequency phenomena-or what beat frequency is to you?.

I didn't say or even imply there is an energy gain using two oscillators and a beat frequency I only gave a few examples where I have seen a beat frequency take place for myself.


As well so far as Erfinder and I are concerned I consider him a friend however we disagree on many things just as I disagree with you on many things. Erfinder and myself generally laugh about the fact we disagree and we try to convince each other we must be right but make no mistake there is always a mutual respect between us concerning each others work right or wrong. It is a mutual respect that one has made the effort, endless hours in search of something which may never come into being but there is always hope. That is our bond...hope and an absurd amount of experiments we hope will lead us in the right direction.


I thought this was pretty cool...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRpN9uLiouI
Now if we replaced the tuning forks with any two or more oscillators be it a physical oscillation or a field oscillation and we could get some interesting effects.


AC

Superheterodyne.

http://users.tpg.com.au/users/ldbutler/Superhet.htm

The idea of  using two frequencies to produce a third or beat frequency is a very old idea.  But can be a very useful thing to know as this article explains.

Carroll

Quote from: forest on September 02, 2016, 01:20:50 PM
What if the beat frequency is put into parallel resonant tank circuit ?

What if !some! here learn the difference between beat frequency propagation,-- nodes,and antinodes in electromagnetic standing waves.


Brad