Quote from: Magluvin on September 03, 2016, 11:21:12 PM
Hey Brad

Will do so when I get back to shop tomorrow.

What do you expect may happen?  The core does cog the rotor so it is initially a drag. So if I pull it away without shorting the coil the rotor goes faster without changing the input.

Like in my last post on this, I was kinda expecting no effect on the rotor, as in the orbo effect. Then I did a test on a fully wound core and the gen effect was virtually nil, so it has to be a short end to end winding length of just a portion of the core to get max gen output. Even the winding in the vid, if it were the same number of turns but shorter from end to end of the winding, there would be more output but a shorter length bump on the scope. Did that in the earlier test.

I also put some small mags in a plastic tube and used a drill to spin the tube in the hole of the core, and there is output there also. It was low rpm and smaller mags, but it did induce the coil. So if we wind a bunch of individual windings on the core, we can induce them with a spinning diametric mag in the hole of the core which should have reduced core cogging and leave only Lenz to deal with. If coils on opposite ends of the toroid core are say in series, each producing opposing output due to opposite poles inducing each, there may be some different effects there as the loaded coils fields will oppose in the core. That is the next test setup.  The core and mag need to be perfectly center and mounted solid, as in the core held solid and the axle of the diametric mag also, to have a cogless operation with the core.

But I will give it a go tomorrow. 

Mags

Good experiment, and as I posted in my previous post, reminds me of David Squire's work


I was wondering if the full circle toroid, with your experiment as a window, would make a difference?


Ron

Quote from: Erfinder on September 04, 2016, 12:41:36 PM

The force we induce has to be given a path through its inducer.  Trust me, I know this makes absolutely no sense,


Regards

Not so absurd, IF there is a solution to the problem


Ron

Quote from: citfta on September 03, 2016, 05:02:38 PM
Erfinder,

I am really surprised at your behavior. 
Carroll

Hi Carroll,


Wasn't that an interesting series of posts? No surprise actually, it is a test. He thinks quite differently than most of us and applies as much weight to what is not said as to what is said. Once you come to understand there is no meanness in his remarks then the test should become more apparent. He tests us for our mental competency ... but more pertinently... our mental stability. He is seeking to see how comfortably we live with our egos ... but then again, most importantly, to see which one is in charge!


Incidentally, has there been any release of Dave B's "invention"? I don't go there any more.


Thanks


Ron

Quote from: i_ron on September 04, 2016, 10:36:48 AM




Erfinder,


I have always had a minor interest in the work of David Squires. Now I see in the blurb for "Advanced Motor Secrets" he uses the term, "energy transformation"


This leads to a couple of questions, are you familiar with his work and two, is he using the term as you would? Perhaps you could expound a wee bit on this please?


Thanks,


Ron

Hi Ron - A very good friend of mine invested many thousands of dollars and a lot of time in the Squires Device.

The Murakami Army will have you believe that a Bar of Soap is OU, I say you really need to be wary of Aaron and Soap!!!

It does suffer from Lenz's the same as a normal motor. I really should not post any pictures as they are not mine to post, but:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Quote from: EMJunkie on September 04, 2016, 04:48:19 PM


Hi Ron - A very good friend of mine invested many thousands of dollars and a lot of time in the Squires Device.

The Murakami Army will have you believe that a Bar of Soap is OU, I say you really need to be wary of Aaron and Soap!!!

It does suffer from Lenz's the same as a normal motor. I really should not post any pictures as they are not mine to post, but:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Thanks Chris!!! that is exactly the kind of information I needed, much appreciated.


So you see, I am still looking for that "low lenz" generator, lol


The soap saga starts with Chadwick who runs Bear house, who runs JB, prest wicki, Starling, who self destructed, so the army guy, along with a certain doctor, are just the bottom rungs of the ladder. Eyes open here.


Ron