Quote from: Erfinder on November 22, 2016, 03:43:32 AM

You can call me riddler if it suits you....I will continue to call you blind not because it suits me, rather..it is a reflection of reality. 


You think you know, and don't, your latest brain fart with the bucking fields in that HHO contraption.....hilarious.  That Tesla circuit I mentioned, the one you tell us we aren't authorized to speculate on....if you knew what could be done with it, you wouldn't be preparing to entertain the masses with yet another dead end.  You (not you specifically, you are years away from recognizing truth) would give credit where it's due, you would acknowledge those who knew, see "the" example, (the Tesla circuit) and its influence on them.

Lets see how this pans out Erfinder.
Lets mark this post(and your reply post) as a reference.

Question
Do you know what Faradays limit is,when it comes to producing HHO,by quoting it as the MMW value-- Milliliters per Minute-per Watt
Post up your answer,and we will set that answer of yours as the benchmark.

Then we will see how my HHO system pans out against your posted limit 

If i fail to surpass that limit you post,then you have the right to call my system another brainfart idea.
If i beat your limit,then you may make a formal apology to me-right here on this thread.

How's that sound?.


Brad

Quote from: Erfinder on November 22, 2016, 06:06:28 AM

Reference to what?  No specifics were addressed or pointed out, I made a statement, specifically, I called your attempt hilarious.


I have no interest in your little thoughtless challenges brad. Information is the name of the game, and we are all sitting on a mountain of free info, that being said, if I didn't know, how would you truly know I didn't.  What caught my eye was your reference to bucking fields.....  I was intrigued by how little thought you invested in your hypothesis before you presented it to your fans, you know, those folk who praise you prematurely, or for no good reason.  It seems that today the mission is to perpetuate ignorance.  Some say I am at the forefront of that movement.  Fuck those folk. 


Shorting one of the windings in a transformer results in the inductance dropping in the other winding.....   I recall saying this before.....I recall demonstrating this, yes, it was in a useless presentation I made, and offered the community as food for thought.  The dropping of inductance means or at the very least suggests, that more of the available energy is delivered to the load, and less energy is "stored" in the systems (the coil) opposition to change mechanism.  You quite literally decrease the level of "negative" influence that Lenz's law has on the operating circuit.  That and not this bucking brainfart is square one.  This isn't to say that the field developed in the secondary does not augment the primary, however, when we consider the the impedance of the secondary, and add to this the insanely high DC resistance of the secondary in question (cough MOT), one voices the question, in tears, WHAT IN THE FUCK IS THIS GUY GOING ON ABOUT!  (note there is no question mark....)



Not intersted in your cheesy, comparison.....if for no other reason, you don't see what one in your position must see by now.....sad sad sad.



If you fail, you failed.  If you beat the limit, woppty fucking dooo...., sun shines on a dogs ass too, it's still a brainfart.

I see you once again avoid stepping up to your own conviction's-but nothing out of the ordinary there.

I would also suggest that you brush up on what takes place in a bucking field situation,as saying that the primaries inductance value drops,is pretty useless.
Why dose the inductance value drop,should be more what you are looking for.
What causes this inductance value reduction,and increase of voltage 10's of times greater than the supply voltage,and a current flow increase that exceeds that of which the generator can deliver.

You say you know Tesla's work,so use that knowledge to better your limited understandings of bucked fields,due to shorted secondaries.
Think more about what the expanding magnetic field dose,when the secondary coil is shorted,and then put that toward your small portion of the effect,you call a reduction in inductance value.

Saying that the inductance value of the primary drop's when the secondary is shorted,is like saying the wheels of a car will turn,when the car is moving--where is the force coming from that causes the car to move in the first place?.


Brad

 reply 1328:
Shorting one of the windings in a transformer results in the inductance dropping in the other winding.....   I recall saying this before.....I recall demonstrating this, yes, it was in a useless presentation I made, and offered the community as food for thought.  The dropping of inductance means or at the very least suggests, that more of the available energy is delivered to the load, and less energy is "stored" in the systems (the coil) opposition to change mechanism.  You quite literally decrease the level of "negative" influence that Lenz's law has on the operating circuit.

                                                               supplemental information (approvement ?) :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=MY&NR=137586A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=20090227&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

In the course of their research, the inventors have analyzed a relationship between inductive reactance and capacitive reactance of a signal, and have noted an inverse relationship, which results from a phase difference which occurs between the voltage and the current of any signal. It is possible to depict on a unit circle a relationship between the degree of phase offset relative to zero phase (or complete coherence) and resistance and/or impedance in the signal. For each degree of phase inter-modulation offset, there is a corresponding increase in the resistance or impedance which is inherent in any signal. There is always a certain amount of inductance or capacitance, irrespective of whether explicit inductors or capacitors are used in a given circuit. Issues of inductive reactance and capacitive reactance are important, because the inventors have appreciated that the differences realized between apparent power and true power (and hence in power factor) using conventional methods of power production and utilization result from these differences in phase, caused by inaccurate calculation of and compensation for signal reactances. 

Quote from: Erfinder on November 22, 2016, 07:17:29 AM

LOL....you really don't get it, what a waste..

The kettle is calling the pot black lol.

BTW,Faradays limit is an MMW of 9.82

Can your knowledge of the subject at hand be applied to take the MMW above this limit ?-no,not a fat chance in hell.

Can my knowledge of the subject at hand,be applied to take the MMW above this limit?-- lol,we shall see soon enough.

You really need to get something done Erfinder,and stop with all the !claiming! talk.

I see no one as of yet,has stepped in and said they know what you are talking about.

Anyway,how is that Tesla free energy device coming along?.


Brad

                                  oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOoooooooooooooooooooooooooMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM:

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citedDocuments?CC=WO&NR=2007076615A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=&date=20070712&DB=&locale=


                                                                                         

                                              for physical and mental power equalizing,from Theta-Waves down to :
                                                         http://www.dynactivsr.com/Science_And_Research.html