Quote from: AlienGrey on May 08, 2017, 05:48:27 AM
Not sure I want to read all this 'driberdrab' If you have a bifilar wound pancake coil will it have any inductance ? so if no inductance how has it got resonance ? surely any single wire has inductance but not bifilar wound has none as it's canceled out, I should know as T1000 had us on that one on the Dailly tread.

Of course a BPC has inductance.
Anyone that told you otherwise,needs some schooling.


Brad

Quote from: Erfinder on April 22, 2017, 01:57:52 AM

Fact is, I don't have to show anyone anything, and this is true for anyone.  If I want to show someone something I contact them and show them.  Fact is I don't speak in riddles, only the ignorant think I do.

Luvyawork mate.

Quote from: tinman on May 08, 2017, 07:26:19 AM
Only a fool drives at night,without his head lights on.


Brad

Seriously. You blokes have more in common than you know.  Do a Skype video call ffs. Text is rubbish for comms.

I used Xee2's inductance measures that show a 5% greater Micro-Henries of inductance in his series biflar then his single wound coil of equal turns and wire gauge on both a low and high perm ferrite toroid core.

I reviewed my inductance measurements of two air core bifilar and single wire coils and measured a 10% higher inductance in the series bifilar. The problem was I ran out of space on the bobbin for the single wire at 4 Ohms, while the bifilar measured 5. I divided the Ohms into the Milli-Henries for a ratio and arrived at a 10% greater inductance for the bifilar, twice the percentage of Xee2.

I think the extra difference may be a consequence of my "Home style wrap" so I plan to do one more test with two tight coils of equal turns on a High-Perm ferrite core.

Quote from: Erfinder on May 08, 2017, 12:05:50 PM

It would be an untruth if I were to say that I have not taken any measurements.  Here's the thing....I am not looking for what you and others are looking for, I have very little interest in what many of you are chasing after. 


A scope will not tell me where I stand......  Where I am headed, comparing energy in and out is a waste of time.  A self powering device requires a mechanism.  Your measurement instruments will not reveal that mechanism to you, they, your measurement instruments, will inform you of what they were designed to inform you of, nothing more.  The concept of self powering as you and others present it, is of no interest to me.  I prefer my own dogma.




I disagree.  The problem I have with many of you is your perspective.  You all are preoccupied with systems which "dis-integrate" energy. I busy myself with systems which "integrate" energy.  This simple change in perspective forces one to recognize that there are no "precise measurement protocols" for systems based on integration...... 


I don't need your measurement methods to inform me whether I am making progress and or whether I am headed in the right direction, you cannot of your own accord reproduce, without my guidance, anything that I can demonstrate, with or without your measurement aids!


The sad truth as I have come to see it, you people can't see the forest for the trees.  The system gives what is demanded of it, you choose not to appreciate the manner by which it manifests.  You place demands on the system, force it to yield that which you want.....ignorance....  The system does not judge you, it does not correct you, it accommodates your ignorance!  These fields and forces were here long before man put pen to paper, attempting to quantify and qualify the infinite-unfathomable in a few lines of text.....LOL....  These fields and forces will be here long after the planet has rolled out of the sweet spot it now occupies, a spot which makes man the idea possible. 


It's all reactive, you know it, and yet....you run from it, chasing after .....LOL




Regards

I really can't say that I disagree with you on your points above.  I can say that I see a broad hint in your last statement and therefore would like to ask if you have developed a device that self runs?

Regards,

Pm