Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

Started by George1, January 28, 2019, 02:58:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Floor

Quote from: George1 on January 05, 2021, 07:13:19 AM
To Floor.
-------------------
1) You do not answer my question, you old cheater!:) You are talking again about things that has nothing to do with the topic discussed. Your big mafia masters will not pay you your month salary. You keep failing in your attempts to manipulate the audience and to reject obvious facts. 
2) I am asking again my question. The question is: Do you accept Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
"1 You do not answer my question, you old cheater!:) "

George1, it is your topic, and you are the one that bears the responsibility of answering peoples questions.
There are I think perhaps a dozen times, questions have been asked of you in the topic and to which you have not responded.   Instead you have ignored them and / or changed the subject of the discussion.  As you have done just now by specifying sulfuric acid solution as the electrolyte, then once again attacking and accusing a poster.

"You are talking again about things that has nothing to do with the topic discussed. "

Lie ! The things which I have posted are directly and exactly relevant to the subject matter.

"Your big mafia masters will not pay you your month salary. "

More made up fantasy, lies and empty accusations on your part. 
                There are no "big mafia masters" where I live.
              In the U.S, we handle this S--t when it pops up !
          I think You must have watched too many American movies,
                                    belived too much internet B.S..

If there is a disinformation agent in this topic, paid or strong armed or otherwise....
                                                it is you bud.

"You keep failing in your attempts to manipulate the audience and to reject obvious facts."

Just more B.S. on your part.  Information and some simple facts of the subject on my part .


"2) I am asking again my question. The question is: Do you accept Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?"

Simply                No             not as you have misunderstood and misrepresented them.

If you place other chemicals (acidic or basic) and therefore other chemical reactions into the electrolyte you change the conditions of the electrolysis.

These will change the electrical conductivity / resistance of  electrolyte and therefore also the
current flowing and the power consumption during the electrolysis. Also change the heat generated by ohmic / conventional resistance. Other conditions and outcomes as well.

George1

To Floor.
--------------------------
You are obviously a stubborn cheater and manipulator, you old guy!:)
--------------------------
I am asking you again: Do you have any THEORETICAL (ONLY THEORETICAL!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution?
YES OR NO?


Floor

@George1

What is the goal of your topic here ?

   floor

George1

To Floor.
-------------------------
You pretend to be an expert in theoretical and applied physics. I want you personally to answer a simple question. And this simple question is: Do you have any THEORETICAL (ONLY THEORETICAL!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
(I want to stress upon the fact that your answer must be either "Yes" or "No". Simple and clear.)

Floor



Thank you George1

I am flattered my arguments have so impressed you..

               BUT NO

There is not a single instance wherein, I have claimed,
any where in the entire Over Unity forum
to be an expert in theoretical and applied physics.

If  I appear to have shown so very brightly, rest assured, this is only the
contrast between myself  and your own dimness.