Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

Started by George1, January 28, 2019, 02:58:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

George1

To Floor.
======================
Did you walk straight into the trap, you old swindler? :) Your last "theoretical" article (January 22, 2021, 05:39:43 PM) is full of (a) absurd hypotheses, (b) deliberately hidden mathematical errors and (c) an enormous dose of insanity. You really suffer from some kind of severe mental defectiveness.
---------------------------------------
Let me divide my simple question into two even simpler sub-questions. This is because you understand simple things with great difficulty.
---------------------------------------
1) Firstly, Prof. S. L. Srivastava (Ph.D.) wrote, that current through the electrolyte is given by I = (m)/(Z x t).
I am asking you a question: Is this equation I = (m)/(Z x t) true? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
---------------------------------------
2) Secondly, Prof. S. L. Srivastava (Ph.D.) wrote, that power consumed = (I) x (I) x (R) =  ((m)/(Z x t)) x ((m)/(Z x t)) x (R) = 31.86 W.
I am asking you a question: Is this equation power consumed = (I) x (I) x (R) =  ((m)/(Z x t)) x ((m)/(Z x t)) x (R) = 31.86 W true? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
---------------------------------------
All members of this forum are looking forward to your two answers. Each of your two answers must consist of one word only -- either "yes" or "no".
---------------------------------------
Do you understand well what I have written above? Shall I repeat it?
---------------------------------------
Obviously your masters kick seriously your a**! Did you get a thrashing? Some punches in the nose? Because as if the volume of your last insane "theory" (your post of January 22, 2021, 05:39:43 PM) is obviously directly proportional to the number of slaps you've got. :)
----------------------------------------
I will repeat again as you likely have some mental problems: Each of your two answers must consist of one word only -- either "yes" or "no".

Floor

Quote from: George1 on January 24, 2021, 06:58:10 AM
To Floor.
======================
Did you walk straight into the trap, you old swindler? :) Your last "theoretical" article (January 22, 2021, 05:39:43 PM) is full of (a) absurd hypotheses, (b) deliberately hidden mathematical errors and (c) an enormous dose of insanity. You really suffer from some kind of severe mental defectiveness.

1. Its not "theoretical".  Its is comprised of standard definitions as I have
expressed them.
2. It contains no hypotheses at all.  Again, its not theoretical, its contains standard
definitions, and explanations only.
3. It contains no deliberate mathematical errors (if you see one point it
out and I will gladly correct it).
4. Your childish insults only take away from your credibility.

  floor


Floor

1) current through the electrolyte is given by I = (m)/(Z x t).
---------------------------------------
2) Secondly, Prof. S. L. Srivastava (Ph.D.) wrote, that power consumed = (I) x (I) x (R) =  ((m)/(Z x t)) x ((m)/(Z x t)) x (R) = 31.86 W.

Will you you start with a clear and simple explanation of these formulas, in plain english
so that we beginners can easily understand them.

          floor

George1

To Floor.
----------------------------------
I would not dare to call you an idiot (my good manners do not allow me to do this), but you are doing your best to earn this "honorary" title.
-----------------------------------
Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution is given below.
Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution consists of two lines only.
LINE 1. Current through the electrolyte is given by I = (m)/(Z x t).
LINE 2. Power consumed = (I) x (I) x (R) =  ((m)/(Z x t)) x ((m)/(Z x t)) x (R) = 31.86 W.
-----------------------------------
I am asking you (PERSONALLY!) my question for the 20th time: Is Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution correct? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
-----------------------------------
All members of this forum are waiting for your PERSONAL(!) answer for the 20th time. Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!

Floor

The word Idiot offends you, while the words liar and cheat do not ?

That is the greatest kind of idiocy.

People usually respect when others have the courage to admit they were wrong.
Man up.

While it is true, that every one has at times lied and every one of us has cheated, and surely
will again in some manner, at some time in their future, this is not, and nothing can
justify taking a criminal path in life.

Were not talking about stealing a loaf of bread because you, or a someone's child
is in need of food here.

I can and I should accept that I, or anyone else is sometimes wrong, or even defending of
their error.  At least for a time.   But some things are not defensible.

So get off your B.S. stance and find something else to do with your time,
and if you are not an idiot then stop behaving as if you were.