Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

Started by George1, January 28, 2019, 02:58:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Floor

The truth is your topic in just an attempted scam and click bait.

Floor

Your original stupid George1 scam attempt.

This is your original statement and attempt to get money. It is from the
first page of your topic here.
   @
https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/pages_1-6.pdf

Last page of that PDF is shown below as "George1 stupid scam"

So if you can't get $10,000,000 then what?
You'll  take the chump change from monetized hits here instead ?
How much does 138222 Views pay ?

You don't know nothing do you ?

One word answer only.
    Yes or No

Floor

@George1

Do you George1, believe this simple electric heater has efficiency
greater than 1 ?

Answer is NO, isn't it ?

Personally I think a person has some right to challenge
the proofs of science, its dogmas and so on.
If only that were the purpose for which you started
this topic, I would have not objections ?

Are you still trying to sell your "secret" technology ?




George1

To Floor.
----------------------------
Hi old cheater,:)
1) You again try to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner. Obviously you are not familiar enough with the art of successful manipulation. Your masters will not pay you your month's salary and will beat you. You have to run quickly!:)
2) Look again at my post of March 01, 2021, 03:58:45 PM. Let us proceed further with our previous questions as written in our post of March 01, 2021, 03:58:45 PM.
----------------------------
Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution is given below.
Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution consists of two lines only.
LINE 1. Current through the electrolyte is given by I = (m)/(Z x t).
LINE 2. Power consumed = (I) x (I) x (R) =  ((m)/(Z x t)) x ((m)/(Z x t)) x (R) = 31.86 W.
---------------------------------------
I am asking you (PERSONALLY!) my question for the 27th time: Is Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution correct? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
----------------------------------------
All members of this forum are waiting for your PERSONAL(!) answer for the 27th time. Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!

Floor

@ George1
I repeat my simple question again.

You don't know nothing do you ?

One word answer only.
    Yes or No

:)
floor