Quote from: floodrod on March 20, 2023, 07:16:00 AM
Excuse my reply if I am wrong.  I usually won't reply if I feel it is out of my lane, which this is.  But I have to ask..

It appears to me like the machine builds great torque only when it jumps the gap.  But then there is the opposite reaction when the flux path aligns again which results in little to no torque. So the torque on the output is not constant. It has peaks and valleys.

I see this somewhat similar to the "twist drive".  In that case, COP 2:1 is created- but COP 1:2 when resetting the device.

I remain doubtful till I see more.

Your restraint is far greater than mine :-D
Wise to remain doubtful, the more we notice, the less convincing a case it appears to become.

I imagine the one-way bearing's job might be to prevent the COP 1:2 phase on one side of either first or second stage?
Or would that serve another, unconnected role?

Quote from: Mem on March 14, 2023, 03:49:11 AM
Here is a practical design to test this MotoFlux idea.
The first stage (the little) shaft has to have one-way bearings to prevent the kickback.

Apologies if this has been discussed, but would the second stage (rotor) never get into a situation of risking kickback? A one-way bearing on that mounted to the stator, couldn't hurt?
Alternatively I could imagine a flywheel mounted via one-way bearing to either interruptor, rotor, or both. The flywheel could be driven by spring load to keep pace with its associated member, and then more or less lock in that speed for it member through the one-way bearing. It's a different things to be prevened negative rotation, and to run into a hard flywheel connection when slowing down. Intuitively I'd want to try and keep the accelerated positive rotation mostly disconnected from the flywheel, although input smoothening may well turn out advantageous anyway.

Quote from: floodrod on March 20, 2023, 07:16:00 AM


I see this somewhat similar to the "twist drive".  In that case, COP 2:1 is created- but COP 1:2 when resetting the device.



I remain doubtful till I see more.

If we install another such device on the same shaft, but with a shift by some angle.
So that when there is a large torque on one device, and a small one on the other.
And they worked the both  on one common output shaft.
Then it will all just turn into a device that transmits rotation one to one?

Quote from: kolbacict on March 20, 2023, 08:36:49 AM
If we install another such device on the same shaft, but with a shift by some angle.
So that when there is a large torque on one device, and a small one on the other.
And they worked the both  on one common output shaft.
Then it will all just turn into a device that transmits rotation one to one?

The "proof of" concept is presented with 3 phases of stators. Isn't that largely the same thing?
Would you feel it would be better to have two, perfectly out of phase?
I'm not sure the half phases are perfectly symmetrical, else that would look really well.

Quote from: kolbacict on March 20, 2023, 08:36:49 AM
If we install another such device on the same shaft, but with a shift by some angle.
So that when there is a large torque on one device, and a small one on the other.
And they worked the both  on one common output shaft.
Then it will all just turn into a device that transmits rotation one to one?

Basically yes as I see it.

Take a magnet rotor. Put another outside magnet close to the rotor. You created a situation where you get more torque when it repels the rotor, less torque as it's approaching the repelling field.

Now put two magnets on either side of the rotor. They pretty much cancel each other out if position perfectly.

 Hi !   Mike Corbin came up with a very interesting idea.   One can imagine such a legend - Edward Leedskalnin woke up William J Putt and William J Putt woke up Mike Corbin       .  A common phenomenon for them is the interaction and change in the properties of magnets in various ways.
           I see a high probability that this device is a workable energy multiplier.

          Perhaps I will have time to adapt this technology for a solid state device. It is also desirable to adapt this technology for easily accessible parts.
         And after these works, I plan to publish everything in the public domain    .

                                          I hope that Big Oil trolls won't send me a lot of messages with ridiculous offers again        


                              Best regards Boris