@Bill
            Thanks so much for the scope probe diagram i had been looking for a day or so now for one with no luck this will make this easy to use with my laptop im pumped! Thanks again, and the motor design  with table stabilizer works real well , that method  is what has given me the best results thus far, and highest speed, i didn't want you to think it was some crazy idea that might work.

                                                                                                  Joe                             

@ Localjoe:

No, I didn't think it was a crazy idea Joe.  A crazy idea is to put 2 rods in the ground and expect to get electricity!!!  Now that's a crazy idea....but it works.  I like how you seperated the battery from the direct magnet contact with your design.

As I said about the probe, I have no idea if this guy that designed it knows what he is doing.  (Just found it by surfing) It might pay to search on the net a little more and if we see similar designs then, probably ok.  I wish I knew more about electronics...which is why I am reading as much as I can.  I am more of a hands on type of learner.  Kind of like...wow, don't touch that big capacitor, it will knock you on your ass.  I know this because I did it....very good lesson. Ha ha. Still raining here.

Bill

G?day all,

As sometimes happens in research fortuitous co-incidences happen that help a great deal. In this case it is a new thread opened up by Stefan http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,844.0/topicseen.html  entitled: Amazing nuclear power converter via oscillating tank circuits !

This is a fascinating circuit in that it describes the Stubblefield earth battery the way I understand it now. In fact, other than irradiating the secondary coil with U 238 from the inside, as opposed to Stubblefield who irradiated the secondary from outside with pitchblende, the idea is exactly the same.



This fits in also with Barbat?s patent. Perhaps we are onto something here, time will tell.

Thanks Stefan.

Here is the original photo with descriptions of the device in question.



Hans von Lieven

Hans:

Great stuff!!!  I downloaded one photo and blew it up (no punn intended) and it appears the uranium is encased in a sealed glass tube of somekind.  I am not up on nuclear physics but does glass block the radiation?  If it does (to make it safe) then how does the radioactivity influence the circuit?  We have many things in our homes that are radioactive, to a point.  Americium, in a small amount, is used in our smoke detectors.  I wonder if enough of that would work in a replication of the design you posted?  I love how this research leads to these type of coincidences as you mentioned.  Probably just the tip of the iceberg.  Thanks.

Bill

I have been thinking of just that Bill, Americium may be the ticket here. and no, glass does not block radiation, it's just a convenient container and insulates the metal from the coils electrically.

Hans