Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 36 Guests are viewing this topic.

polarbreeze

Quote from: OilBarren on March 23, 2008, 04:47:05 PM

"By Faraday's law, the voltage on the coil is the rate of change of flux through the coil.
It doesn't matter one bit that the flux is confined to the shaft.
That's why transformers work, eh?"Cheers, Mr. Entropy


YES BUT TRANSFORMERS USUALLY DON'T  ROTATE AT 1000 RPM DO THEY?

Thane.




Doesn't matter. Put a coil around the shaft. Measure the current. This will tell you what the magnetic field is in the shaft. If you want to work out the absolute value, then you'll need to calibrate the coil against a known field - but you'll be able to learn a lot just by observing how the field changes when you change the "generator" operating conditions. It will be most interesting to look at the shape of it on an oscilloscope too.
PB

OilBarren

Quote from: polarbreeze on March 23, 2008, 09:18:22 PM
Quote from: OilBarren on March 23, 2008, 10:44:39 AM
Quote from: polarbreeze on March 23, 2008, 09:43:27 AM
The drive-frequency theory explains that too. Higher frequency means higher slip, which means higher torque, which delivers the acceleration you observed. It does not require additional electric power input because some of the power that was formerly being dissipated as heat is instead accelerating the motor.

OK NOW EXPLAIN WHY THE EFFECT IS THE SAME (ACCELERATION) WITH:

AN 18 POLE ROTOR
A 6 POLE ROTOR AND
A 2 POLE ROTOR -
A SINGLE MONO-POLE ROTOR

A 1 POLE STATOR COIL,
A 2 POLE STATOR COIL,
A 4 POLE STATOR COIL,
AN 8 POLE STATOR COIL
AND A 9 POLE STATOR COIL.

AND A TOROID COIL THAT DOES NOT PRODUCE BACK EMF IN THE AIR GAP BUT DOES INTORDUCE ROTOR FLUX INTO THE DRIVE SHAFT?

ALSO 1 MORE THEORY PLEASE...
WHY DOES THE ROTOR IN DEMO 2 SPIN FASTER AFTER THE STEEL BAR IS INSERTED BUT BEFORE THE COIL IS SHORTED?

Thane

I think the best approach will be to thoroughly analyse just one example by taking measurements and comparing them with various theories of operation. It will be very confusing to try to work with all variants at once. When a robust theory starts to emerge, then will be the time to see whether it also can be applied to other variants of the experiment. IMHO.
PB

GREAT! THANKS FOR THE OFFER!
JUST LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU WANT TO COME TO THE LAB AND GET STARTED?

Thane

polarbreeze

Quote from: OilBarren on March 23, 2008, 11:07:06 AM
Quote from: polarbreeze on March 23, 2008, 09:30:18 AM
The way to check that would be to look at the magnetic field at different points inside the motor.

THE ONLY PAUSIBLE WAY TO ACHIEVE THIS WOULD BE THROUGH COMPUTER MODELING AS PROPOSED BY DR. ZAHN OF MIT WHEN HE PROPOSED HIS HYSTERISIS THEORY.

SO PB HOW DOES ONE LOOK AT THE MAGNETIC FIELD INSIDE A MOTOR WITH 100% ACCURACY?

Thane

One way to do it would be to put some sense coils at strategic spots inside the motor.
Another option might be to use a Hall effect sensor but I haven't ever done that myself.
While you're about it, you could try a Ham effect sensor to monitor the baloney. :)
PB

PS - "100% accuracy" isn't a requirement, at least not initially. It's sufficient to gather approximate data to point us in the right direction. Refinement can come later.

ramset

PB that was good !!!
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

OilBarren

Quote from: polarbreeze on March 23, 2008, 09:31:58 PM
Quote from: OilBarren on March 23, 2008, 11:07:06 AM
Quote from: polarbreeze on March 23, 2008, 09:30:18 AM
The way to check that would be to look at the magnetic field at different points inside the motor.

THE ONLY PAUSIBLE WAY TO ACHIEVE THIS WOULD BE THROUGH COMPUTER MODELING AS PROPOSED BY DR. ZAHN OF MIT WHEN HE PROPOSED HIS HYSTERISIS THEORY.

SO PB HOW DOES ONE LOOK AT THE MAGNETIC FIELD INSIDE A MOTOR WITH 100% ACCURACY?

Thane

One way to do it would be to put some sense coils at strategic spots inside the motor.
Another option might be to use a Hall effect sensor but I haven't ever done that myself.
While you're about it, you could try a Ham effect sensor to monitor the baloney. :)
PB

PS - "100% accuracy" isn't a requirement, at least not initially. It's sufficient to gather approximate data to point us in the right direction. Refinement can come later.


GREAT! THANKS FOR THE OFFER!
JUST LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU WANT TO COME TO THE LAB AND GET STARTED?

I CAN SWING BY YOUR HOUSE IN CARP ON TUESDAY AND PICK YOU UP?

Thane