Quote from: OilBarren on April 11, 2008, 06:44:17 AM
LATEST TRANSFORMER TESTS

IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE HOW THE PRIMARY IS VIRTUALLY NON RESPONSIVE FROM 1 M ohms RIGHT DOWN TO ABOUT 20 ohms. IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE BUT THE VOLTAGE ACROSS THE LOAD REMAINS STABLE AT AROUND 2.9 VOLTS THROUGHOUT AS WELL.

A CONVENTIONAL TRANSFORMER RESPONSE CAN BE SEEN HERE:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/magnetic/tracir.html#c3

LUC WILL BE ADJUSTING THE SECONDARY TURNS # TODAY TO INCREASE THE VOLTAGE ACROSS THE LOAD - TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS IN THAT CASE.

Thane

Since it's so difficult to read the meters in the photos, can you just report the results in a table similar to the one in the link you provided for conventional transformer response?  The photos also cause the overunity.com message pages to take longer to load.  One would be enough to show the setup. Thanks.

Quote from: aether22 on April 11, 2008, 07:23:57 AM
BTW should it prove useful to anyone here are ways to increase the power of the effect:
Number of magnet poles on rotor
RPM
Number of turns
More coils?
Stator closer to rotor poles (it should increase effect as flux and induction should increase)
Better core and coil form (assuming hoptoads observations are relevant)
Shorter more direct path to motor

In terms of efficiency parameters ...........
For RPM & number of magnets : simplify to "frequency"
For number (and gauge) of turns, and number of coils: simplify to "impedance"
For air gap : no simplification, because the optimimum gap is dependant on magnet strength and length, and core material and core length.
Better core and coil form : no need to simplify!
Cheers  all.

Quote from: aether22 on April 11, 2008, 06:20:34 AM
Whoever keeps changing the subject of this thread, can you maybe not?

It can make it hard to keep track of it!

That's RunningBare.  It's a bad idea to carry on a conversation in a thread that he starts, because when the conversation goes in directions he doesn't approve of, he gets peevish about it and tries to kill the thread by changing the subject.

Quote from: Mr.Entropy on April 11, 2008, 10:57:12 AM
That's RunningBare.  It's a bad idea to carry on a conversation in a thread that he starts, because when the conversation goes in directions he doesn't approve of, he gets peevish about it and tries to kill the thread by changing the subject.

It's an annoyance for sure. Maybe time to start a new Heins thread with a more helpful title, and just link to this one.

While we're on  peevish, nothing beats the completely shameful and outrageous censorship going on in the new Stiffler section.  Used to be an interesting conversation to follow, but now it's just mildly creepy.  Give me wandering off topic and mild shenanigans any day over being muzzled by a diva under the guise of 'staying focused'.

Quote from: PerpetualLurker on April 11, 2008, 09:42:10 AM
Since it's so difficult to read the meters in the photos, can you just report the results in a table similar to the one in the link you provided for conventional transformer response?  The photos also cause the overunity.com message pages to take longer to load.  One would be enough to show the setup. Thanks.

I AM SORRY ABOUT THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE METER READINGS - THAT IS WHY I SAID, "IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE BUT THE VOLTAGE ACROSS THE LOAD REMAINS STABLE AT AROUND 2.9 VOLTS THROUGHOUT AS WELL."

THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE WAS NOT ALL THAT RELEVANT TO US ANYWAY AT THIS TIME - WHAT IS RELEVANT IS THE PRIMARY RESPONSE TO THE SECONDARY LOAD.

I JUST SENT CONVENTIONAL TOROID TRANSFORMER PHOTO-DATA TO JM FOR POSTING - YOU WILL NOTICE THE PRIMARY POWER RANGE FROM 0 W AT 1 M ohm LOAD TO 10 W AT 20 ohm LOAD.

ALSO WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO US IS THE VOLTAGE IS SELF-REGULATED AND DOES NOT COLAPSE ACROSS THE LOAD (2.9 VOLTS) WHEN THE LOAD IS CHANGED (AND NOT AIDED ) BY THE PRIMARY.

IN THE CONVENTIONAL TOROID THE VOLTAGE ACROSS THE LOAD @
1 M ohms = 19.63 V,
20 ohms = 11.95 V,
1 ohm. = 1.43 V WITH A HUGE PRIMARY POWER INCREASE WHICH DOES NOT OCCUR IN OURS.

Thane