Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Anyone know this tesla device?

Started by uk_guy, February 02, 2021, 05:42:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

captainpecan

You are 100% correct. And that is the EXACT theory I have been basing all of my experiments on. In my mind, it's all about RECYCLING that energy. You are not creating it or destroying it. We cannot do that. But it appears that the work done by the motor is the "Free Energy" per say. The magnetic field that is generated around the coil of wire as current passes through it, is the secret here. That magnetic field, (in my opinion) is not coming from that wire. It is the environment reacting to the current of the wire. That means the magnetic field is "independant" of the actual energy in the wire. That magnetic field can slow down the flow of current in the wire, Lenz law, but it is not "created" by energy leaping out of that wire and being lost in the environment.


There was some work Tesla did I tried studying many years ago. There just doesn't seem to be much about it anywhere anymore. But what I am referring to I believe was called the Tesla Shuttle but I may be incorrect with the name. I cannot find the patent anymore or anything by that name. I hope someone in here remembers it and maybe can remind me what it was called. But it was following the entire idea of passing energy THROUGH devices to power others while still getting the work done from the first one. I sure wish I could find more about it now. So much I want to learn from it and recreate to test. But I honestly believe he visualized this way more simple than many of us make it out to be. I think is simply recapturing as much as possible WHILE you get work done from the devices. Adding them together gets you to what we believe is overunity. But hey, trying to prove it is where the real fun is...

captainpecan

Something that always bothered me about capacitors though, is that assuming the equation is absolutely correct for figuring energy in a capacitor, you effectively lose half of the energy immediately just charging the capacitor. Clearly it's not exactly 50%. Many things go into consideration. But for the most part, it is very lossy. While figuring ways to utilize lithium ion cells in certain ways can give over 90% efficiency in recharging. Clearly there are advantages and disadvantages of both methods. But I have always had that initial loss bouncing around in my mind every time I try amd decide the use of capacitors. Are they really that inefficient? My tests seem to prove that they are. Can we improve on that somehow? Possibly maybe charging them in series from back spikes that are high voltage, and then discharging them in parralel to a load or to recharge batteries. It seems you would avoid that immediate 50% loss of energy for some reason. Maybe I am incorrect in that. But it's an idea.

sm0ky2

I see it like this:


When you just place your charge on one side,
1/2 the capacitor charges, the other half induces
an equal and opposite charge - this is the other half
of your energy - the part you 'lose'.


If you take a 2nd inductor (reversed), pass the same electricity
through the 2nd one and feed it to the other side
You effectively have 2x charge on your capacitor
resulting in pretty close to what you put into it.
(minus heat etc)

I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

dawson

I've seen it before on the video, but I don't remember its specifications.