A truly interesting transformer overunity concept

[leviterande]

This is really a truly  positive and nice forum and I appreciate all the responses
Paul, I  agree.  shouldn't this also mean that all the MEG devices concepts are pure  bogus too?  Seriously we maybe and I mean "MAYBE" shouldn't be fooled that  a permanent magnet "ingredience" in a  device will magically solve the overunity issue and this will lead me to my main point of the issue:

if you need a free STATIC magnetic field, you  ofcourse  choose a magnet
, however  most forget that a  good ferromagnetic electromagnet also PRODUCES  superior static magnetic field with  very  small power.

Hoever now,   one said that an iron core  "only concentrates the flux" and not strengthening it. if this is the case than,  all the ideas  written by me are 100% meaningless and 100% invalid, because   there is no difference in this case between an iron core and an air core... well... all hopes are 100% gone in this case.. but really. Im saying... is the magnetic flex only concentrated  and never increased?. Anyway.. Total lifting power is much stronger in an iron cored coil..

Leviterande

[leviterande]

I may be  a stupid, foolish ignorant guy but please explain to my little mind how   the Flynn concept could ever  be cabaple of OverUnity, why is it so hyped when a simple electromagnet is far superior obviously:

Why  I think so? For the heck of it and to show my  main  point/question lets just first  see the following TWO examples:

1-Flynn device: is claimed to output 3.5 times more than  " input/other electromagnets/otherdevices etc"  ha?? how can you even say such a thing..electromagnets can be made from inefficient to super efficient. a flynn PP device consumed like 0.2watts,  and outputted 650grams.
W/o the magnets it outputted 200g.  So wait a second...,the electromagnet here did only lift 200g, Thats a very very weak electromagnet and we could as well get rid of the PP path and the magnets and just work on the electromagnet part. In other words, we can throw the magnets and for the same 0.2 watts we can get 40lbs out of the coil itself, instead of 1.5lbs(650grams)

  B = 4Ï€ x(10 -7)x k x n x I
2 -A ferromagnetic core electromagnet:  on the other hand lifts 1200lbs with 6watts at 12v and 0.5A and a toy magnet will lift 500lbs with  2 D-cells

so whats the difference here? ha? its all about the power in vs  whats comig out.
I really hope you get my point here, Im not making any theory or any opinion. Im not saying that an electromagnet will produce overunity. Im just stating  that  Flynn device  is nothing more than  n "elegant strange looking" electromagnet that isnt even strong  or efficient as other   stronger ones...and I really really want to know why the flynn meg idea is any BETTER than just a rather standard electromagnet..... why all this hype