Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



808 G6 OSIRIS ENERGY TECHNOLOGY

Started by osiris, December 03, 2010, 09:33:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

luishan

I think I am stupid. I still not understand the concept.
Would you show us schematic and would you explain that ?
Also Would show us on Youtube the working video ?
Thank you.

e2matrix

I think that's how I remember learning it also - what GL said. 
   So osiris I'm not sure I understand exactly how or what you are doing with this setup but it sounds like you may be switching some very high current.  If that's correct what will you be using for the actual switching where contact is made and broken with that much current? 
    Nice battery finds - wish I had that much battery power here but can't afford that kind.  Still looking for a deal on a forklift battery though...

nievesoliveras

Thank you @groundloop!

I will recheck my information sources when I get the time to clarify for my peace of mind about the voltage and capacitance on a capacitor when in series or parallel.

The document you posted says that I am wrong.

I need to know now where I learnt that wrong information.

Jesus

Edit:

Looking for the information I found this from goldmine that corroborates your words.
The two capacitors in series add the voltage but cut the capacitance in half.
The two capacitors in parallel add the capacitance and the voltage stays the same.

nievesoliveras

So according to the new information it should be like this:

TinselKoala

The problem seems to be a misunderstanding about the meaning of the voltage rating of a capacitor. It's NOT like a battery's rating !!

The voltage rating of a cap is the maximum safe voltage you can put on the cap without taking the chance of "puncturing" or shorting the dielectric between the capacitor's electrodes.

So putting caps in series logically adds together their voltage ratings--just like stacking a bunch of insulators adds up the total voltage that can be stood off by the stack.

The ENERGY on a capacitor is proportional to the SQUARE of the voltage that the cap is charged to, but is only linearly proportional to the capacitance. Energy (in Joules) = (C*V*V)/2, with capacitance in Farads and volts in volts. The power able to be delivered by a capacitor depends on how fast the charge energy can be released into an external circuit and is complicated.

The capacitance of a cap can be considered a constant. The energy on the cap is proportional to the square of the voltage and can be thought of as the energy it takes to stuff a bunch of mutually-repelling charge carriers into a tiny space--the more charge, the greater the energy required, and the more voltage (pressure!). The tighter the space, the more energy required...or the more the charge, the more energy required....and so on.