Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[WilbyInebriated]

Haha Wilby that's desperation for you! The answer was in what you quoted and what you subsequently said... amusement my man... pure and simple!

indeed your hypocrisy is amusing...

And who said I reinvented gasification ? I never made that claim, I just reworked it a bit to make it simpler for people to play with.

english... do you speak it?

re·in·vent  (rn-vnt)
tr.v. re·in·vent·ed, re·in·vent·ing, re·in·vents
1. To make over completely: "She reinvented Indian cooking to fit a Western kitchen and a Western larder" (Irene Sax).
2. To bring back into existence or use: reinvented the concept of neighborliness.
Idiom:
reinvent the wheel
1. To do something again, from the beginning, especially in a needless or inefficient effort: "School districts need not reinvent the wheel every time they try to improve their schools" (Washington Post).
2. To recast something familiar or old into a different form: "Call it reinventing the wheel or recasting old ideas, but these contemporary versions have a spirit and style all their own" (New York Times).

number 2 would be the applicable one in this instance.

I got a question for you Wilby... How much energy EXACTLY is in a battery ?

RM

which battery?

[Bubba1]

And Bubba - I am NOT interested in the 'power' as I KNOW that it cost the battery nothing.  What I want to know is HOW MANY JOULES was dissipated as WORK?  Because I also KNOW that the most that bank of batteries can deliver is 5 x 12 x 40 amps.  Over time therefore it is 5 x 12 x 40 x 60 seconds for 60 minutes.  I've got that from the battery suppliers.  And I misquoted the amount of batteries.  It should have read 5 NOT 6 as I erroneously referenced.

For the last part with the higher frequency, heating 870 grams of water (100-82)degrees: 4.18 X 870 X 18 = 65,458.8 joules.  Do that in 10 minutes and you average 65,458.8 joules/600 seconds = 109.098 watts.
As for the first part, there are too many unknowns.  Raising the temperature of 870 grams of water 66 degrees Celsius in 10 minutes is impressive, but the heater was hotter than boiling water when you put it in the water.  It had "momentum" so to speak.  I am not any kind of expert, especially a thermodynamics expert.  There are just too many unknowns at this time.  The best that I can come up with now is that it took 65,459 joules to heat the water (maybe 870 grams, maybe less) 18 degrees celsius.  Your circuit was putting out roughly 65,459 joules every ten minutes at the end.

[evolvingape]

Haha Wilby nice try 

As a scientific pursuit of the truth behind the claims of this circuit then this thread has most certainly been a total waste of time thus far. How can you possibly dispute this when no progress has been made ? As an amusement it serves the function well. So where is the hypocrisy ? Your attempt at labelling me a hypocrite when my original reply contained the answer to your misconception is laughable, you even quoted it!

As for reinventing gasification I see that your both correct and incorrect. The stratified downdraft gasifier can be classed as a reinvention of the original Imbert design, but as I have not changed any of the operating processes, principles or design of the stratified version I have certainly not reinvented the technology, and it was definitely not me that brought the technology back into use.

As for the changing of the form you are correct, the off the shelf components and miniaturisation can be classed as a reinvention. You should try being more specific in future to avoid multiple interpretations of your statements, unless that is of course your goal.

And as for the battery lets use the model in Rose's circuit. Please tell me EXACTLY how much energy is in each of the individual 5 battery's.

RM

[Rosemary Ainslie]

For the last part with the higher frequency, heating 870 grams of water (100-82)degrees: 4.18 X 870 X 18 = 65,458.8 joules.  Do that in 10 minutes and you average 65,458.8 joules/600 seconds = 109.098 watts.
As for the first part, there are too many unknowns.  Raising the temperature of 870 grams of water 66 degrees Celsius in 10 minutes is impressive, but the heater was hotter than boiling water when you put it in the water.  It had "momentum" so to speak.  I am not any kind of expert, especially a thermodynamics expert.  There are just too many unknowns at this time.  The best that I can come up with now is that it took 65,459 joules to heat the water (maybe 870 grams, maybe less) 18 degrees celsius.  Your circuit was putting out roughly 65,459 joules every ten minutes at the end.

Golly Bubba. That's some interesting math. 

And Evolvingape - I've told you the answer.  40 ampere hours from a 12 volt battery supply gives 480 watt hours.  Therefore  it theoretically can provide 480 watts for each second over the period of a single hour.  And with 5 of those batteries we've got a potential of 2.4 KWH which is simply five times more.  Apparently it's not correct because each battery has got different ratings.  Some can discharge heavy currents and others can't.  Therefore the watt hour rating is simply a guide to its potential work output.  No wonder I wasn't allowed to include those battery draw down tests for our Quantum paper.

Regards,
Rosemary

[powercat]

Ignoring the issue won't make it go away, since you have attacked me and called me a liar in previous posts I now consider this my duty, so that no one new to this forum will be misled into believing that you have a circuit that produces OU, unless of course you, oh yeah you're not communicating, repost time then

You can't tell me of any member on this forum that has produced OU with your circuit, because nobody has.

Here are few videos for members on the forum, they are other members that didn't make videos who also failed in their attempts to match your claim of OU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrwgEb5ac_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM8BBa7_Zpc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x0wQJrc9To
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GBS3sKcB8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trip8gjoxMQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpaP__5Kd38

Do something different Here on This forum,and stop ignoring reasonable requests for tests. or stop claiming OU on This OverUnity Forum.
A big conspiracy, it would appear that anyone that says your circut doesn't workor or indicate's measuring error, is then part of that conspiracy.
Many members have made reasonable requests that you ignore including Stefan,Mr Mag amongst others,but you ignore them and carry on regurgitating your same old arguments.

Go on Rosie proof that 99 is wrong in his analysis and makes something that runs and runs and put it on the Internet after all,
(Quote from Rosemary)
"All one needs are the the measurements and some reasonable account of the apparatus that produces those measurements".

The fact still remains that no one here can reproduce your claims of OU, and you are not willing to do anything to change that deadlock, apart from use this forum as your soapbox and blog.

On this forum you are expected to interact to prove your claim, if you are claiming OU,I think that is reasonable.