Seeking funding for potential over unity device.

[Goat]

@ Omnibus

Although I agree with you on a lot of points in your post the Rosemary Ainslie circuit is opened sourced and freely available to all to replicate and validate the device as OU or not OU...given that everyone uses the same equipment and parameters...I agree that there's tons of claims of OU devices and no academic involvement but Rosemary Ainslie seems to be at least making an effort to work with them and not asking for money in return for all the information she's given us already.  I think we need a lot more people like her to make it provable first ( or not) before going to market.

Regards,
Paul

[Omnibus]

@Goat,

No, not at all. That's one of the instances causing much harm in Academia. It shouldn't even be mentioned. Of course, our forum is free for all kinds of ideas, bogus or not, but when it comes to approaching mainstream with that kind of stuff it should be strongly discouraged. Probably you read the other day the exchange I had with one of the moderators of one such mainstream forum -- the minute it's detected it has anything to do with OU you're lumped up with tons of these aggressively seeking attention amateurs. You might have seen, he overwhelmed me with links to discussions they have discontinued (for a good reason, at that) of such unsubstantiated claims. Also, I had an exchange with two of the professors in S.Africa who have supposedly observed and analyzed the claims and the outcome was less than discouraging. So one has to be really careful what one is getting into, especially in this controversial area -- for his own sake and for the sake of not putting a bad name to it.

[Goat]

@ Omnibus

Wow that's a relevation!

Perhaps this forum needs is a single thread to claim/disclaim all the proven from unproven OU claims, maybe that would cause enough a stir for every claim to openly provide enough information to replicate and prove or go away...seen too many claims over the years I'm really weary...I haven't seen a thread in this forum so far that says "This is it! Here's how to do it" but there's always hope that one of the ones that claims this is going to happen and soon.

Regards,
Paul

[Omnibus]

@Goat,

Honest efforts are also prone to mistakes and I'm not talking anout that. I think we're in agreement on that. We've seen, hiwever, throughout the years a lot of bogus claims and fraud, aggressively pushed. A lot of aggressive confusion too. This is what I mean. In the instance at hand we have another example of the latter.

[MrMag]

@ Omnibus

Wow that's a relevation!

Perhaps this forum needs is a single thread to claim/disclaim all the proven from unproven OU claims, maybe that would cause enough a stir for every claim to openly provide enough information to replicate and prove or go away...seen too many claims over the years I'm really weary...I haven't seen a thread in this forum so far that says "This is it! Here's how to do it" but there's always hope that one of the ones that claims this is going to happen and soon.

Regards,
Paul

Actually, there is a thread here where a person says "this is it". I really don't know how to read this person. He seems to be very negative against anyone who has claims or at least promising results, but when it comes to him, it's a different story. And talk about giving OU a bad name. You should see this guys demands in a science forum.