Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hope

First sorry for the partial repost but it is part of saved text document.

This zero point may  be made or collected and perhaps that is what Ed Leedskalin's wheel did.  Notice the magnets all pointed outward which made the center of those magnets all point inward.  When he cause movement in the wheel he created a zero point in the center of the wheel which was collected within the iron mass below (old cast iron engine block).  So he could then draw from the sea of energy thru his "windings and air capacitors" to filter what he needed (which kind of charge) He was going to use the zero point to attract or nullify.  I know this is off topic but it is the overall key to the sea of energy if my thoughts on this are correct.  The nicest part of zero point is that it attracts ALL the energies of every type.  So Zero Point Energy is the wrong term, it should be called just The Zero Point or The Null perhaps.

What I mean by "it collects or attracts energies of every type" is all energies (positive or negative for instance..heat or cold..etc). Which make me think positive or negative charges are the same thing only our reference point is at a cental point between them so we see them as either positive or negative in reference to our charge or wavelength.

void109

I have a power measurement question.

I made a replication of the idea from materials I had available, a couple half-donuts from some ikea furniture, stainless steel, and a toroid I got from Metglas last year.

Question: Is measuring voltage over a load (on output) sufficient to calculate power consumed, when the load is the only thing in the output circuit?  I just have a 10 ohm resistor on the secondary.  I made a crude picture of my setup.  Would I use ohms law, V/R = I to get current, so 20V / 100 ohms = 200mA.  Then P = I^2 * R to get power, so .2A * .2A * 100Ohms = 4 watts?


Side note + horror story == chuckle:  They shipped me these two tiny toroids as samples when I requested them, I just had to give them my fedex shipping account so I could pay for the shipment itself.  Toroid's were free, however overnight shipping from Japan (which I did not ask for) was $250.  And that's $250 last year, when the dollar was worth more!  So when dealing with these companies, if you give your shipping account information, specify HOW you want it shipped. lol

broli

Quote from: void109 on August 25, 2011, 01:36:45 PM
Question: Is measuring voltage over a load (on output) sufficient to calculate power consumed, when the load is the only thing in the output circuit?  I just have a 10 ohm resistor on the secondary.  I made a crude picture of my setup.  Would I use ohms law, V/R = I to get current, so 20V / 100 ohms = 200mA.  Then P = I^2 * R to get power, so .2A * .2A * 100Ohms = 4 watts?

Yes, but only if you are very certain of the resistance and the coil's resistance is significantly lower than the load's resistance. If not then you just add the coil's resistance in the power equation, this will give you only more output power so showing OU without it would only enforce your case.

void109

Thanks for the quick reply broli.  In that case, I'll get meticulous with measurements, take pictures and such, create a better diagram to post.

JouleSeeker

  Does anyone have results (in watts) for this Gabriel device for input Power and P-output that can be shared?

   Also, SRM and others -- what direction did you wind your primary and secondary windings, CW or CCW?

   Finally, did you wind using single-winding or (Tesla's) bifilar-winding method?

   Regarding the differences in magnetic field caused by single-wound versus bifilar-wound, I just posted some results on another thread where these windings are being discussed (among other things) -- some may find these DATA (not speculation) interesting:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10773.msg298830#msg298830

Thanks again for the lively, open-source discussion.
StevenEJones