Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mavendex



Thestone

Quote from: wayne49s on March 23, 2011, 07:13:28 AM
I've been looking a bit more in detail how the device is suppose to work, and I don't believe this device works according to Thane's approach. To avoid the BEMF to the primary, Thane's approach was to move some of the magnetic flux from the secondary to a separate core (the secondary core). This requires that the secondary coil be wound over the 2 cores as pictured above. If you look at the Garbriel device, it is exactly the opposite; it is the primary core that encapsulates the 2 cores concentrically. According to Faraday's law, the magnetic flux from the secondary coil will impact and generate a BEMF in the primary coil since the primary coil turns are wrapped over the secondary core also.

If we were to apply Thane's approach to the toroid configuration, the primary and secondary coils would be switched (i.e. the primary on the inside toroid), and the higher permeability core on the outside also. In this way the outside secondary core would absorb most of the secondary flux and not impact on the interior primary coil to generate the BEMF.

Assuming we can replicate the results, it may be a lot tougher to explain how the device works, lol! If anyone sees something wrong in the analysis, let me know.

/Wayne

From my point of view all these devices are trying to duplicate the principles on the "Saturable Reactor".

The Stone.  :)

verpies

@rfmmars
David Klingelhoefer is the original inventor of the Gabriel Device, right?

Is this device non-working or a fake?  There is a big difference...
Can you elaborate why you think so?

@anyone else
Did anyone measure larger power output than the power input, on the Gabriel Device yet?
If yes then how was this measuremnt made?

Quote from: rfmmars on April 21, 2012, 08:49:06 PM
Yes here's the best update
David Klingelhoefer, RemeroUK= FAKE

Cheap4All

@Mav.  Its great to see you back, but by God you make me a nervous wreck watching your vids with you playing around with those live wires like that ! I don't know how you have the courage !!
No wonder a while ago, I thought you may have blown yourself up. If I had only known what you were doing with those live wires back then, I would have had even more reason to think that.  :o
But it seems like you are having great success which I am ever so pleased to hear because we sure do need a product like this. So am looking forward to your next update/s with great keenness.

@verpies. I don't know who you are, nor have I seen you here before, but what a damned cheek you have coming in here and chucking your weight around like Lord Almighty.
I suggest you stay away if that's the way you are going to carry on.