Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



SMOT - Close to closing the loop ,second video-BIG improvement

Started by billmehess, March 31, 2011, 01:05:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

billmehess

A magnetic array on the return slope Will absolutely result in a sticky spot. All will be revealed soon, very soon.
Bill

mscoffman

@FYI All,

I's like to point out that;
A ball running on rails where all of it's weight is supported on tracks
is a different thing then a ball rolling on it's circumference on a flat
plane.

A sphere will have a "coupling factor" between it's rotational
momentum and it's forward momentum. That coupling factor is
a gearing ratio between the rpm representing rotational momentum
and the forward velocity representing the forward momentum.

So by varying the track width is possible to change the gearing ratio
of the stored energy in the runner within certain limits. This can
cause the ball to act as a flywheel. This is not the same as a runner
always rolling on it's circumference which will always have a unity
transfer function.

:S:MarkSCoffman

maw2432


Low-Q

Quote from: mscoffman on April 15, 2011, 12:06:17 PM
@FYI All,

I's like to point out that;
A ball running on rails where all of it's weight is supported on tracks
is a different thing then a ball rolling on it's circumference on a flat
plane.

A sphere will have a "coupling factor" between it's rotational
momentum and it's forward momentum. That coupling factor is
a gearing ratio between the rpm representing rotational momentum
and the forward velocity representing the forward momentum.

So by varying the track width is possible to change the gearing ratio
of the stored energy in the runner within certain limits. This can
cause the ball to act as a flywheel. This is not the same as a runner
always rolling on it's circumference which will always have a unity
transfer function.

:S:MarkSCoffman
In any case, there should always be a unity transfer function (?). The difference is the coupling factor which determine the forward speed versus the rpm of the ball. In any case the mass in the ball is accelerated to a given rpm which always correspond to its forward acceleration - regardless of the coupling factor X : 1, or if the ball rolls directly on its circumference 1:1. However, in practice, losses are more likely to occour when the coupling factor are very high (high rpm, low forward velocity).

Vidar

billmehess

Quote from: maw2432 on April 30, 2011, 03:59:01 PM
Bill,  any progress on closing the loop?
Still working on it daily. That last 1/4" is proving illusive. But since I have made up 2 1/2 " of a 2 3/4" drop I believe the remaining  1/4" will be overcome also.
Bill