Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[Lakes]

I agree with Tk, I had the same thought, at some point wayne must have had a smaller demo version built and running before spending the money on a larger version.

So, just show the demo running on a live feed, why not?

Or, invite Tk to inspect the current machine (under NDA), if he says its works, watch the investors queue up and make wayne a very, very rich man...

Clanzer would ideal for building a demo unit, but I think all his time is being used to set up his CNC manufacturing factory.

[WilbyInebriated]

Or, invite Tk to inspect the current machine (under NDA), if he says its works, watch the investors queue up and make wayne a very, very rich man...

i doubt that venture capital investors hinge their decisions upon the opinions of some anonymous flamboyant marsupial internet personality from a fringe science forum...

[Ghost]

Again this guy is not going to fully Open Source his machine.
History will once again repeat itself and this “break through” will be lost just like many others.
Our current corrupt Government will NEVER let a self-sustaining free energy machine be commercialized. Remember Tesla? Government will lose control of the people if it happens…
So far there is NO concrete Open Source evidence how this machine works.
Yeah go hide in you safe room where you belong, you will be doing us (most of us anyway) a favor!
Now who really wants to save the world? Open Source it! Or fuck off!

[telecom]

Well, I don't read Russian as well as I should but I can see already that there is a problem between Figs 1 and 2 in the first link. The water height "h" is shown to be the same, but if the figures are showing what happens when the ovoid shape is pushed into the water, that's wrong. As the shape is pushed under the water from the floating position in Fig. 1, the level of the water "h" will rise... and it is the lifting of this water which provides the buoyant force.

I will try to  explain briefly what I have understood, but first the name of the author is Mr. G.P. Perveev,  ut27972@yandex.ru   ,  ut27972@narod.ru (no disrespect for
mrwayne)

According to him, the principle is very simple.
First of all, the submerged body doesn't have to exit the water, so the water level doesn't change.
The body's volume is such, that it takes a very small amount of an additional water to have it to sink when it is close to the surface, or a very small amount of air to rise, when it is at the bottom.
Think of a submarine!!!
Basically we may have a body with a fairly large displacement, say, 10 tons, but because it is balanced in this way, it takes a very little energy to make it to go up or down.
So, if we have a 10 ton body at the bottom of 1 m vessel, and it takes it 1 second to rise, the power produced will be 100  kw!
Needless to say, that the body doesn't have to weight 10 tons, but it can be connected to the load with the weight of 10 tons by the mechanical means.

Alex

[telecom]

Offcource this isn't correct.

It will only be 10 ton when you empty it completly and it will sink, or when you put in enough air to make it rise at 10 ton.
In the little water little air example you will only get the differential force you create so this would be the same for a 1 gram piece and a 10 ton piece it all depends on how much water/air you pump in and out not on the weight of the actual container.

So is this now claimed to be the new travis effect or what?

The work is done by the displacement according to Archimedes.
Little air/water just to make it to move.
Like in here: