Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[telecom]

Offcource this isn't correct.

Hi Microcontroller,
I see your point - basically it will take the same amt of energy to bring load down as up.
will keep browsing through his website looking for an answer.
Alex

[TinselKoala]

i doubt that venture capital investors hinge their decisions upon the opinions of some anonymous flamboyant marsupial internet personality from a fringe science forum...

I'll have you know, Wilby you meatball-challenged pasta chef you, that I had my pouch surgically removed as a child and no longer associate at all with my marsupial relatives. Besides, where I come from, a person's marsupiality-- or lack of it--- is not considered a topic for polite discussion.

But then nobody has ever accused you of being polite, have they, you flesh-colored crayon-scribbler you.

Now... do you have an on-topic comment to make about the veracity, or lack of it, of a buoyancy drive that runs of itself? No? Then stuff this in your pouch and incubate it.

[neptune]

You know, some days I think I have selected the wrong forum . I was under the impression that this was an OVERUNITY FORUM. All I have to go on is the title. If I am right , then this is not the "Overunity is impossible" forum.
        I make no secret of the fact that I am an Atheist. No big deal. But I do not waste my time interrupting church services, and being rude to the local priest. I respect him. He has his ideas, and I have mine.
        Back around the year 1890, the then chairman of the Royal Society, proposed a motion. His motion was that the Royal Society should be disbanded, on the grounds that all the scientific discoveries had now been made, and everything was now known. That guy is no doubt dead now . But I seem to recall that we have discovered one or two things since then. Dead he may be, but his spirit and philosophy is alive and well.
        Mark Dansie is a well respected sceptic investigator who has seen this device with his own eyes . But we have people here so gifted that they are better qualified to judge, even from several hundred miles away. At least in their own eyes.
       Does it work? I do not know yet, because I have not yet learned all there is to know about it. But I intend to go on learning. The evidence so far looks promising .
        The laws of physics are the summation of what we have learned up to now.  Assuming there are no "holes" in them takes us back to the arrogance of the 1890s.
           "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will become yet wiser"

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi Mr. Wayne,

Thank you for sharing your idea here.

TinselKoala and Neptune bring up some valid points on the difficulty of fabricating a small model. If there are no takers to build maybe you could have your engineers develop a small working 3D model of it and put it up on Shapeways (www.shapeways.com).  A 3D printed model would allow for some tight tolerances.

[johnny874]

I agree with Tk, I had the same thought, at some point wayne must have had a smaller demo version built and running before spending the money on a larger version.

So, just show the demo running on a live feed, why not?

Or, invite Tk to inspect the current machine (under NDA), if he says its works, watch the investors queue up and make wayne a very, very rich man...

Clanzer would ideal for building a demo unit, but I think all his time is being used to set up his CNC manufacturing factory.

   Lakes,
  it's possible he might have built it before doing any testing. The lack of gauges showing pressure, volume of flow, etc. are missing.
it's that type of information that would dictate the development of an idea such as this. Wayne did mention that he was adding data collection devices to obtain this information as someone he knows suggested it to him.
  I think if he would have done so that he would have found out that by compressing hydraulic fluid, it slows it's flow rate which diminishes the work it can do in the way he is trying to use it. With hydraulic theory, it's potential is increased by low pressure acting on one side of a piston and the opposing piston acting on the hydraulic fluid has a smaller surface area (edit) but has no extra travel. Volume is being exchanged for pressure. (end edit). His device uses compressed air to act as a piston. I think what he might not have understood is this information. For me, I think if he spent more money without doing actual testing that the costs he incurs might cause him more problems which he wouldn't need. And not all those costs would be financial.
If he really wants to try something that might work, he might consider a weighted float. As the Russian guy mentioned, it could be quite heavy which would have a lot of potential. Any way, Wayne can think about it. But as some have mentioned, this is supposed to be a Research Forum.
And as for Stefan's moderation ? His being patient might be seen as a good thing by some. It allows idea's and discussions that might not other wise be allowed.