Your should be able to understand this little jewel

[Lakes]

These video's and animations our group came up with have been lying around for years and no one will pay any attention to something so clearly overunity. I just don't get it.
Butch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kjHa-GPtMM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDBBYvg5YDk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQZay4JAzoQ

Do you have working models of the animations?
You are not going to grab peoples attention by producing animations alone.

[broli]

Do you have working models of the animations?
You are not going to grab peoples attention by producing animations alone.

This is what's wrong with this place.

[gammarayburst]

"E= mc2 was just letters written on paper.
Can you imagine if Einstein was told, if you don't make a working model no one will pay any attention to it.
Well he didn't make a working model but other smart people saw what was there and made a working model.
I think it was called a nuclear fission device.
Also you have to remember that alot of people lurk this site and never post, but take the information and run to the patent office.
Also, an animation is better that nothing at all or a negative post.
Butch"

[Lakes]

"E= mc2 was just letters written on paper.
Can you imagine if Einstein was told, if you don't make a working model no one will pay any attention to it.
Well he didn't make a working model but other smart people saw what was there and made a working model.
I think it was called a nuclear fission device.
Also you have to remember that alot of people lurk this site and never post, but take the information and run to the patent office.
Also, an animation is better that nothing at all or a negative post.
Butch"

Pretty animations are just that, Einstein would have provided the full math on how he arrived at that equation, totally different.

[Low-Q]

I'm going to do a very ballsy thing based on the fanning action. If we take in account all the experiments couldn't we do something as ludicrous as the setup below.

The problem with fanning, is that the fanning is a result of a magnetic path which wants to find its equilibrium. When that is met, the magnetic flux is conducted at its best, given the conditions. So for the design you got, the greater space between the edge of those discs will be more attractive to the magnet than the closer space. This will provide a counter force which will balance the force of the fanning effect itself. So the discs will not start to rotate (If that is the purpose).

If the magnet wasn't more attracted to spaced pieces of metal, the fanning effect wouldn't occour at all. The opposite of fanning effect is the contraction effect which occour angular to the magnetic field which cause the fanning effect. So what happens if you combine those effects. Take one disc slightly higher than the other, so the outer edges cross eachother so one disc is partially over the other, but still inside the magnetic gap?

It's late, and I am just emtying my head so I can go to sleep

Vidar