Self Running 40kW (40,000 Watt) Fuelless Generator from witts.ws scam?

[lamare]

Hi guys,

Do you know what this thing is??

It sure looks a lot like Ron Brandt's "Ecklin Variable Reluctance Generator". See page 14 in this pdf:

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Extraordinary-Science-Issue-4-1994.pdf

I've watched these video's, which contain a presentation by Ron Brandt with his motor:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCf0jsaq874m-byUpNTRZcTg

Ron talks about this Ecklin device, about which you can find more here:
http://www.rexresearch.com/ecklin/ecklin.htm

His Ecklin device seems to have been his first prototype, which eventually led to his PermMag motor, of which they've made the plans available on Google drive just months ago:
http://www.bestenergy.ws/FreeRonBrandtPlans.html

From the conversations about Ron, it does seem that these guys have been in contact with him. Also, they have photo's of his workshop and other things, and the plans do seem to match what Ron showed in the 1995 conference.

Interestingly, there are no photographs with a properly wound PermMag motor stator.

From what I make of it, this is essentially "magnetic flux switching" technology:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_switching_alternator

This is the same principle as has been patented as the "MEG" by a/o Tom Bearden. His colleagues posted a very interesting video, explaining how they got to the MEG design and how "flux switching" works:
https://youtu.be/no50_5iSr2Y

So, it seems these guys do have at least Ron's "Ecklin Variable Reluctance Generator" in their possession, but they don't appear to have a working PermMag motor, cause they don't know how to wind and control it. It seems Ron was the only one who actually understood how to get the PermMag motor running, so the plans are pretty much useless to anyone who does not understand how magnetic flux switching works and what that can do.

If I counted correctly, there's 3 stator pins+coils for every magnet. In order to get the motor to spin, you just need to pulse a coil at the edge of a magnet on the rotor, which will cause the magnetic flux to switch trough that coil, which will give you torque. So, I would say a coil needs to be wound around every stator pin, and only one out of 3 is pulsed at a time, while at the other two you can collect BEMF power....

[casstete]

WITTS is a bunch of wanker SCAMERS ,

Thieving people , but consider that the NWO aka IllumiNAZI's r controlling all the sciences including alternative energy .


Prof Keshe released all his info and recenty with FBI busted a Pedophile ring of 70 000 members ... whos webmaster was

ALAN STERLING !!

Another free energy SCAMMER ! & NOW convicted Pedophile .

The Pedophile Elite runs Free Energy world as well as everything else .

Just build the real Lenzless tech and you CAN ALWAYS RECOGNISE IT


Lie so  :   If there is a source - motor/generator - Load it ALLWAYS goes down like this

Without load its innefficiant ( looks useless )

Add a load and motor spins faster + input energy from source drops drastically !

Same device is now Overunity where without a load OR with a load NOT USING ALL POTENTIAL POWER

it will look useless !

[lamare]

I think I pretty much figured this stuff out and understand what it needed to make this work: a permanent magnet.

See my posts here: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/16584-analysis-witts-generator-17.html#post297072

[lamare]

Ron Brandt was an early pioneer of brushless pulse width modulated DC electric motors, and generators.  He chose to use what is presently referred to as an outrunner topology.  His motor is common practice today, with one exception.  Ron was well aware of the necessity for properly recovering, and routing said recovered electrical energy generated in his motors.  This particular motor has nothing to do with the QEG. His failed attempts at getting the Ecklin generator to work motivated him to blaze his own path, a path which led him to make a few profound observations.  According to who you choose to believe, it was these observations (beknownst or unbeknownst to them) which inspired the unsubstantiated claims being disseminated by the leaders in the QEG community.

When you compare the image on page 14 of this pdf with the device demonstrated by Witts, it is clear that the device demonstrated by Witts IS Ron's "Eckliin" experimental prototype !!!

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Extraordinary-Science-Issue-4-1994.pdf

In other words: the "self running 40 KW Fuelless Generator"  demonstrated by Witts has EVERYTHING to do with Ron Brandt's work, because it IS HIS ACTUAL EXPERIMENTAL PROTOTYPE of his Ecklin generator.

Just compare the picture of the "main frame" on the picture with Ron and the device demonstrated by Witss. There is no doubt this is his actual machine, they actually say so themselves on their website:

http://www.witts.ws/40kw-self-running-generator-qeg-help/

Our 40kw generator class for the above  demonstrated by its builder in this video posted by WITTS several years ago, is still available today. It was invented by former WITTS spokesmen Ronald Brandt and Nikola Tesla.

And no, he did not fail to get the Ecklin generator to work. He added something in order to make it work and he has been able to run it at a COP of about 1.05 (105%) efficiency, which is what he claims hilmself in the article above.

In his 1995 presentation, recently also released by WItts, he says that he had problems running his Ecklin motor/generator at high RPMs, because the magnets would rip of the rotor. That's why he designed a rotor whereby he placed the magnets within a cylinder, thus preventing the magnets flom flying out of the machine.

In other words: in order to get this first prototype working like his Perm-Mag motor and properly implement "flux switching" as a principle to obtain free energy out of the vacuum, one needs to design a proper rotor incorporating a magnet.

And yes, you can extract energy out of the vacuum using permanent static magnetic field, as has been documented by Prof. Turtur:

http://www.gsjournal.net/old/physics/turtur1e.pdf

If this motor is "common practice today", I'd like to see a link and check it out for myself. You see, as far as I'm aware, COP>1 motors are not exactly common practice today.....

[lamare]

He chose to use what is presently referred to as an outrunner topology.  His motor is common practice today, with one exception.  Ron was well aware of the necessity for properly recovering, and routing said recovered electrical energy generated in his motors. 

There's one additonal exception. When I look for outrunner topology, I find this in WP:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushless_DC_electric_motor

The additional difference is that the common practice implementation uses one permanent magnet, while Ron's design uses a lot of magnets, about 1 for every three stator poles. In his design, there are 50 stator poles and therefore 16 magnets.

This allows for "flux switching", as is being done in the MEG. I highly recommend watching this video by Lee Kenny, one of the inventors of the MEG, which shows you exactly how magnetic flux switching works and how they got to the current design of the MEG:

https://youtu.be/no50_5iSr2Y

Regards,

Arend.