Ibpointless2 Crystal Cells

[NickZ]

  The point of the discussion was to add that light is not "traveling" as we are being taught. Nothing is "moving"  there is a "Polarization of the medium", but no movement involved from point A to point B.
This is all very difficult to explain, and maybe boring to some, as we are still being brainwashed into thinking that sunlight is traveling through the solar system and outer space to get to us from our Sun.  Which is not the case. 
   What I'm trying to say is that in the same way that light is polarized in our planets photosphere to provide what we erroneously call "SunLight" (which should be called Earthlight, instead) as it is created here and not on the sun. Therefore does not 'Travel" to get here as thought,  which is still being taught in our schools.  NASA knows better, as a rocket going towards the Sun, will be in complete darkness after only a relatively short time that it takes for it to clear the photosphere of the planet, where light is created. Beyond that there is no light or heat (going toward the Sun) until within a couple of thousand miles away from it.
  The point above is to compare how some cells may be able to POLARIZE energy out of the surrounding ambient, in a similar way as polarized light is created on our planet, and does not to travel from the Sun to get here.

  No need to argue with text book examples,  I've heard it all before.

                                                                  NickZ

[jbignes5]

I just said the same thing nick rofl...

But I would like to say one thing. This polarization is all the way from the sun. Thats why solar cells work in space. The polarizing is all through the medium until it is polarized with mater then it discontinues. Mater interrupts the polarization of the medium because it displaces the medium inside of the matter and the matter is so closely bound to that that it manifests on the surface of that mater. If mater wasn't there the light would go on forever. But the speed of the polarization has a limit in lights case. It is after all the reason we can look backwards in time by merely looking up. Light is merely a manifestation of a resonance(frequency) in the medium of space. If light had no limit it would all blurr together and we wouldn't have a way to tell time. So ultimately light does have it's limits.

The medium of space on the other hand has no limit. It's response is near unity. Nothing could ever be faster the zed. Zero point would be so infinite it would be like poking a balloon. You thought the atomic bomb was big. Try releasing all the pressure in the universe in a single fraction of an instant. But that will never be able to be accomplished. The medium of space can not create the kind of unzipping that created this hollow we live in. Yes I said it. There was no big bang. Is was the advent of a bubble in the black hole we live in. We must live in a Black hole because there is a vacuum in space. That vacuum is self evident that we are in a container. However big that container is, it must be beyond belief at the size of this container.

We know how to create a vacuum on earth so it must be the same process out there. *Points up* The problem is I think this container is steadily growing. Ever since the unzipping it has expanded like a balloon. This is why the Universe is speeding up. This is why the distances are growing steadily between galaxies. The bubble is expanding.

[ibpointless2]

  The point of the discussion was to add that light is not "traveling" as we are being taught. Nothing is "moving"  there is a "Polarization of the medium", but no movement involved from point A to point B.
This is all very difficult to explain, and maybe boring to some, as we are still being brainwashed into thinking that sunlight is traveling through the solar system and outer space to get to us from our Sun.  Which is not the case. 
   What I'm trying to say is that in the same way that light is polarized in our planets photosphere to provide what we erroneously call "SunLight" (which should be called Earthlight, instead) as it is created here and not on the sun. Therefore does not 'Travel" to get here as thought,  which is still being taught in our schools.  NASA knows better, as a rocket going towards the Sun, will be in complete darkness after only a relatively short time that it takes for it to clear the photosphere of the planet, where light is created. Beyond that there is no light or heat (going toward the Sun) until within a couple of thousand miles away from it.
  The point above is to compare how some cells may be able to POLARIZE energy out of the surrounding ambient, in a similar way as polarized light is created on our planet, and does not to travel from the Sun to get here.

  No need to argue with text book examples,  I've heard it all before.

                                                                  NickZ

I guess this would explain why on a sunny day it feels warm but if you were to go into space you would feel cold even though your in direct sun light?

[ibpointless2]

I was able to break the 2 volt barrier today! 


I had to use a rock as one of my electrodes and then magnesium ribbon in tap water.


Can anyone guess what rock that is, its a common rock. 

[jbignes5]

I was able to break the 2 volt barrier today! 


I had to use a rock as one of my electrodes and then magnesium ribbon in tap water.


Can anyone guess what rock that is, its a common rock. 

sandstone?