SMOT

[Omnibus]

@peter_schmalenbach,

Thanks again for the link. Unfortunately, it still appears that this quotation is just an urban legend used by internet enthusiasts to enhance their claims by associating them with a known name. Do you think that thought of Heisenberg can be found in some collected works of his, such as this:

http://libserv.aip.org:81/ipac20/ipac.jsp?uri=full=3100001~!13255~!0&profile=newcustom-aipnbl

[sm0ky2]

Update on the SMOT?

Has anyone made a working replication of a Closed-Loop SMOT device?

[hartiberlin]

All,
have a look at this ramp design.

Also pretty neat for the SMOT:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4428.0.html

You need these 90 degrees iron core pieces to guide the flux away at the ramp?s
end.
Also it helps inside the track to make it more asymmetrical.

Regards, Stefan.

[Low-Q]

ken i think the reason why it isnt kept on the same plane is that, the ball uses the height of the drop to escape the magnetic field.

As i think otherwise if it was just on a flat plane then the ball would roll past the ends and then get pulled back in.

Kane

when the ball doesn't go upwards, it will have greater speed at the end, and still be able to escape the magnets. The reason why the ball escape at all, is just because the ball is at first released on a spot that is not in balance between attraction of the tracks inside and outside. The escape is therfor already applied by the hand in advance. What a trick

br.

Vidar

[Low-Q]

All,
have a look at this ramp design.

Also pretty neat for the SMOT:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4428.0.html

You need these 90 degrees iron core pieces to guide the flux away at the ramp?s
end.
Also it helps inside the track to make it more asymmetrical.

Regards, Stefan.

Iron does sure lead the magnetism in another path. That just results in a weaker attraction where it suppose to be an attraction. The result is therfor again at square one.

Br.

Vidar