SMOT

[prometheus_effect]

Hi Kysmett,

I don't think you will get too much success by going horizontal after the drop. Better to do a direct return to the start but stay on the magnetic centre line.

Prometheus Effect

[kenbo0422]

Kysmett,

Its not the recognition I was looking for, but just wanting to know that this train of thought had been 'presented' so as not to keep repeating ourselves.  I think I'm guilty of it as well....   

[Kysmett]

First off, I'm moving.     So time to actually do stuff has dwindled to about zilch.

However, I plan on putting this to the test with an actual prototype of the ferrous wheel when I finish the move sometime in the next two weeks. 

Prometheus, I'm not sure what you are objecting to.  Please clarify the problem as well as your suggestion.

Thanks

[PaulLowrance]

Dear Kysmett,

I appreciate your design and it seems legitimate to me.  Although I have suggested that these poor people, who have been sucked into what I call a distraction project, just go along with what Greg says; i.e., the ball must drop.  Otherwise they will never hear the end of Greg.  Therefore I have suggested a near zero friction based system.  Instead of a tube, they need to use a flat curved ramp, like a skateboard ramp.  Additionally and very important, the ramps surface should be made of Teflon that is lubricated with thin oil.  The ramp could be made of wood and then a thin sheet of Teflon would cover the wood ramp.  This would be cheap and highly efficient.  I have said many times that the efficiency would approach 100% but never over 100%.

They will see that the ball will come close to its starting height but never over.  In the case of famous SMOT video, the ball starts at 30mm and ends at 23mm.  That is only 77% efficiency people!

Please people, just have someone build it and get this out of your system once and for all.  This 8 year SMOT work saddens me at how much valuable free energy research time has been wasted.

Kind regards,
Paul

[prometheus_effect]

Posted on the Prometheus Effect discussion group:

--- In Prometheus_Effect@yahoogroups.com, "softwarelabus"
<softwarelabus@y...> wrote:
>
> there is no way in this world you are or anyone is going to
> beat me by getting me to waist valuable time and money building
> this machine.

Beat you? At what? Making a OU device? You lost that round in 1997
when I published the SMOT plans.

Well as least you have finally exposed yourself and revealed your
true intentions. To cast doubt, foster your own ambitions, goals and
theories.

By the way Paul, flux gate motors are not OU.

> I am here to discuss with anyone factual data, any
> step-by-step processes, and to help these people see the "the
> light."

See what "Light"? The "Light" of YOUR theories? Who appointed you or
even asked you to do this? How dare you insult the intelligence of
the other list members by talking down to them like this.

If your time is so pressed, then maybe you should stop wasting it in
this forum and show the world how you can make a OU flux gate motor.

Greg