Any proof?

[ltseung888]

Paradigm Shift and Leadership

I got an interesting email and a follow-up phone call from an Educator interested in the Lead-out Energy Theory.  He mentioned that he was working on the Pulse-Gravity Motor as described in Patrick Kelly’s Book.  The plan was to demonstrate that in a Seminar/Course in June or July time frame.  The Seminar will be aimed at training Leaders.  One aspect of Leadership is to identify paradigm shifts before the masses.

For example, a Leader should understand the impact of the Internet in the 1970s before it was popular.  A Leader should realize its potential to change the lifestyle of millions.  Many old jobs would be lost and many new jobs would be created.  Are there technologies with similar impact today?

The training will use the Lead-out Energy as an example and comment on whether it represents a possible paradigm shift.

The traditional scientists might have been blinded by the imaginary brick wall â€" the inflexible application of the Law of Conservation of Energy.  Perpetual Motion of any form or type is absolutely impossible.  There is no need to waste time and resources in such research.

The Lead-out or Bring-in Energy Theory accepts the validity of the Law of Conservation of Energy.  However, it also accepts that machines can continuously lead-out or bring-in energy from the environment.  Examples of such energy include Energy from Still Air, Energy from Gravity and Energy from the Orbiting Electrons.

The demonstrations will likely include:

1.      The Sound Resonance Experiment.  A constant sound from a signal generator will have its amplitude recorded.  Then a resonance box with height equal to ¼ wavelength will be brought into resonance.  The sound will be much louder.  The new amplitude will be recorded and compared.  The participants will then comment on the source of this extra sound energy.
2.       The Gravity Wheel Experiment.  The participants will first see a Milkovic 2 stage oscillator video.  They may also see a Pulse-Gravity wheel without any batteries.  They will also go into the mathematics of the pulse-pushed pendulum and see if they agree that 2 parts of supplied horizontal energy can lead-out 1 part of gravitational energy.
3.       The Magnetic Pendulum Experiment.  The participants will replace the bob of a normal pendulum with a magnet.  Another magnet will be placed to increase or decrease the attraction force.  They will check whether the period of oscillation changes.  They will answer the question â€" if gravitational energy can be led-out via a normal pendulum, can magnetic energy be led-out via a magnetic pendulum.
4.       The Output and Input Power Waveform Comparison of a FLEET prototype.  They will see that the Output Power Wave is much larger than the Input Power Wave.  They will be asked â€" if you are in the right position of power and influence, will you support this type of research?
5.       They will then be asked to comment on the possible paradigm shift.  How would the life style of people change if such technology is well developed?


There may be different “free energy” prototypes or videos.  There may be different questions.  But the direction of such type of training is clear.  The future Leaders will be trained to predict and guide the future based on possible paradigm shifts.


Many will taste the Divine Wine. 

[ltseung888]

In the coming training in both US and China, we shall discuss the Milkovic 2 stage pendulum.  It is another proof of an overunity device based on the Lee-Tseung Lead-out energy theory.  I shall use the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8

We can regard the pendulum as the first stage and the lever as the second stage.  The lever does not move until the pendulum swing is large.  At the large swing condition, the Weight on the LHS will go up.  When it goes down, it can do useful work.  The question is â€" will the work done or output energy be more than the slight push of the hand (Input energy)?

One interesting point to note is when and how the LHS Weight is lifted?  What forces are responsible?

My answer is â€" two forces are responsible.
1.       Weight of the pendulum bob.  This is always vertical.
2.       The Centrifugal force due to circular motion of the Pendulum.  This force is strongest when the velocity is highest.
3.       The weight of the pendulum bob alone or the centrifugal force alone will not be enough to lift the Weight on the LHS.  Their combined effect at large swing and hence high velocity at vertical position will be sufficient to lift the Weight.

From the Lee-Tseung lead-out energy theory, 2 parts of horizontal energy will lead-out 1 part of gravitational energy.  That represents a COP of 1.5.  The best push is actually tangential.  That will give a even higher COP.  With a single stage pendulum, we cannot extract the energy easily.  However, the two stage pendulum provides a simple mechanism for such energy extraction.

Thus the Milkovic 2 stage pendulum is clearly overunity.  The Input energy (slight pulse-push by the hand) is less than the Output Energy (dropping of the Weight on the LHS).  The Physics and Mathematics confirm it.

I am attaching the xls file with detailed mathematical analysis for those interested.

[ltseung888]

The first draft training material is ready for comments.

It was used on Friday March 23, 2012.  Some polishing is required.

Let the Educators taste the Divine Wine first.

[ltseung888]

http://www.overunity.com/1763/12-times-more-output-than-input-dual-mechanical-oscillation-system/msg316636/#msg316636

Please go to the above link to get a full explanation of the Milkovic 2 stage pendulum.  It is theoretically an overunity device â€" more efficient than the simple pulse-push pendulum.
Another proof is readily available and have been replicated multiple time.  Amen

[parisd]

Dear Ltseung888,

I have seen in 2008 your pendulum overunity basic demonstration and I can see that today you keep saying that a simple pendulum brings Overunity. As you said this is basic secondary school physics, so it would mean that during centuries all students and physics teachers would have missed that discovery ?

In fact there is a basic terrestrial mistake (nothing devine) in your demonstration and I will help you to solve it;
According your excell file, it takes 1,64359 unit of horizontal work to raise the pendulum and give it 0,815965 unit of potential work so according to my simple calculation the efficienty is not above 1 but is simply 0,81/1,64 which is about 0.5 (NO OVERUNITY unfortunately).

But why it would be above or below OU, if there was Overunity then after lifting the pendulum when you let it go it would go to an higher elevation on the other side and it does not, in fact it will go exactly to the same elevation on the other side. (no friction assumed)

Now why did I fing an efficiency of about 0,5 using your calculation, it should be exactly 1; there is an additional mistake in the way you calculate the horizontal work, the force increases from angle 0 to angle 9.46 degree (the final angle you give in your spreadsheet). So you have to integrate the horizontal work from 0 degree to your 9.46 degree for a final force of 10 units then in that case you will find that the horizontal work is exactly the same as the vertical work that the pendulum mass accumulate (potential energy).

Hope in the future you will not make so simple mistakes and claim God brought you Overunity, I am sure others have found your mistakes before and warned you.

Despite this, I am intrigated by a 5KW self running generator from one of your Chinese colleague that I would like to see or to know where to buy one, I have seen it in picture since 2008, in video but do not know why it is not available at least to the OU commmunity or if it is then who has one ?

In the coming training in both US and China, we shall discuss the Milkovic 2 stage pendulum.  It is another proof of an overunity device based on the Lee-Tseung Lead-out energy theory.  I shall use the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8

We can regard the pendulum as the first stage and the lever as the second stage.  The lever does not move until the pendulum swing is large.  At the large swing condition, the Weight on the LHS will go up.  When it goes down, it can do useful work.  The question is â€" will the work done or output energy be more than the slight push of the hand (Input energy)?

One interesting point to note is when and how the LHS Weight is lifted?  What forces are responsible?

My answer is â€" two forces are responsible.
1.       Weight of the pendulum bob.  This is always vertical.
2.       The Centrifugal force due to circular motion of the Pendulum.  This force is strongest when the velocity is highest.
3.       The weight of the pendulum bob alone or the centrifugal force alone will not be enough to lift the Weight on the LHS.  Their combined effect at large swing and hence high velocity at vertical position will be sufficient to lift the Weight.

From the Lee-Tseung lead-out energy theory, 2 parts of horizontal energy will lead-out 1 part of gravitational energy.  That represents a COP of 1.5.  The best push is actually tangential.  That will give a even higher COP.  With a single stage pendulum, we cannot extract the energy easily.  However, the two stage pendulum provides a simple mechanism for such energy extraction.

Thus the Milkovic 2 stage pendulum is clearly overunity.  The Input energy (slight pulse-push by the hand) is less than the Output Energy (dropping of the Weight on the LHS).  The Physics and Mathematics confirm it.

I am attaching the xls file with detailed mathematical analysis for those interested.