Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Heat conversion by using piezzo effect

Started by andreas_varesi, April 11, 2005, 06:59:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

andreas_varesi

Hi Kysmett,

the idea of the patent was to use very small piezzo elements with only some hundred nanometers. Than the local pressure variations should be strong enough to generate a constant current. If you try to rebuild this effect within a larger scale the classical laws of thermodynamics are valid and nothing will happen. Only if you go down to nanometers you can utilize the kinetic theory of gases. And this is exactly the problem for non industrial research - we don't have the possibilities to proof our own theories.

Best regards

Andreas

Kysmett

I wonder how one would structure the material...I say material because I see the end product somewhat like velvet.  A flexible fabric sub-structure with tiny, piezo nano hairs on it.  If worn, or flown from a flagpole, you would get more than just ambiant prssure flux....hmmmm... will have to cook on this some more.  Textile manufacture seems to play a large part in my mental picture however.  The remaining question lies thus:  How dificult would it prove to actually make (or grow) some of this stuff on a fabric?

swankpower

The Michael Jennsen patent is available to view on the following link

http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=DE19942739&F=0

If there is any trouble downloading it I could post the PDF version.

andreas_varesi

Hi Kysmett,

the idea of a velvet like piezo structure sounds very reasonable. But even if you can produce such a material, the next problem is to rectify the alternating voltage. Maybe it is possible to combine piezo hairs with nanotubes that work like an diode. GE is leading in developing such devices http://www.azonano.com/details.asp?articleID=996. Maybe there are also other companies who see a chance in surpassing GEs success with this new idea of combining piezo hairs with nanotubes.

Reagards

Andreas

swankpower

The little cells descibed in the patent are evacuated, to make one dimensional pressure, and sealed with an ultrathin membrane. I would think they would only work for a limited spectrum of pressure and gases.


well we know pV=nRT at this 'classical' level. Pressure is dependent on the number of molecules and temperature and independent of the individual molecules size. The heavier the gas we use surrounding the piezo, the slower the gas molecules will travel, communing the same amount of kinetic energy to the walls per second. If we use heavy molecules which are gaseous at room temperature, z.B. Halon gas: Dibromotetrafluoroethane Atomic weight: 259.84, the average velocity of the gas particles is reduced by about three fourths. Lower velocity particles means more time for the piezo to relax back into its resting position, meaning you can use a little larger piezo. Furthermore, if giving the piezo time to relax is an issue, just put fewer molecules surrounding the cells, just enough pressure to push in the piezo.

There are other less reactive refrigerants which could be used, but if you want stability perhaps xenon tetrafluoride, but thats not a household ingredient like refrigerants.

In case you're wondering where I got that three-fourths figure, I used:
1/2*m1*v1^2=1/2*m2*v2^2 to get
v1=v2*(m2/m1)^(1/2)
try m2=16 (oxygen), m1=260(Dibromotetrafluoroethane), v1=.25*v2

Regards,
Andrew