5 KW Unit Invented in S. Africa

[hartiberlin]

Hi Luc,
please meet with Rosemary Ainsley and help her get rid of her function generator and do some good measurements
with her.

Please let us know, if you can do this.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Luc,
please meet with Rosemary Ainsley and help her get rid of her function generator and do some good measurements
with her.

Please let us know, if you can do this.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Harti - with respect - this is becoming tedious.  You make public announcements like this and leave me no option but to address them publicly.  Kindly take note.  WE ALREADY HAVE TESTED OUR TECHNOLOGY EXTENSIVELY ON APPARATUS THAT ONLY USES A 555 SWITCH.  Should you wish to come to SA to check this out - we will gladly include those tests in a demonstration.  These tests are NOT included in our paper because a 555 switch does not allow us the range of testing options.  However, a 555 switch is able to generate precisely the same oscillation with the precisely the same benefits.  We reference this - in our paper. We have done other tests as well that apply a continual negative charge to a single MOSFET without any switching at all - as you recommended in the early generations of this subject.  We also generate that oscillation.  And it also delivers the same benefits.   Luc is more than welcome to visit us.  But he needs to email me - and he would need to travel another plus/minus 2 hours flight - to get here.  AGAIN.  WE DO NOT LIVE IN JOHANNESBURG.

And Harti - you're not answering my emails.  Why?  And what are you going to do when we're published?  Claim that you saw need to lock my thread in case there was an error measurement - as you keep claiming?  Without taking the trouble to find out the facts?   Interesting.  But I'm sure that no-one will ever consider you accountable.  You are, after all only explicitly assuring your members that you, personally, consider our technology valueless.  And as an owner of this forum you are free to apply your editorial preferences. You're under no obligation to find out the truth.  But I must admit.  It's rather confusing when one assumes you support clean green.  On the whole I'd say I've done our technology a gross disservice by making knowledge of it available on your forum.  Far from offering it the kind of protection that's needed - you've allowed the trolls license to try and kill off the technology together with my good name.  MOST confusing.

Regards,
Rosemary

added

And may I also add this.  IF indeed, these guys are supplying heavy duty watts with this - then THAT IS WONDERFUL NEWS.  It FAR exceeds our own technology - as we can barely get 120 watts.  This and LENR are the promise of the future.  BUT.  We presume to have the THESIS in support of this - which should be of some interest.  The more so as we've not had to invent absurd physics to find that explanation.  And nor have we had to 'DISCOVER' anything outside of the standard model.

I think that there is the very real risk that one day, someone on these forums may actually take the trouble to read what I write.  Meanwhile, in all probability and for saying all this  - I'll again be banned.  What's new?

Again
Rosemary

[Bob Smith]

As part of the common good, every person has an inalienable right to a good reputation, and the right to defend this reputation. It is only fitting that Rosie's right to defend her reputation and the integrity of her work in this forum be upheld in accordance with the common good. To do otherwise would be to undermine the professed nature (and credibility) of this forum as a place for developing "free energy for free, independent people."
Bob

[Rosemary Ainslie]

As part of the common good, every person has an inalienable right to a good reputation, and the right to defend this reputation. It is only fitting that Rosie's right to defend her reputation and the integrity of her work in this forum be upheld in accordance with the common good. To do otherwise would be to undermine the professed nature (and credibility) of this forum as a place for developing "free energy for free, independent people."
Bob

Thank you for this Bob.  It is truly the most courageous statement that has EVER been made on these forums.  There is a propagandising technique applied to the JEWS in Nazi Germany - where all and sundry were encouraged to report on allegations of their sub human habits, which, among other things progressed from killing Jesus Christ to - at its zenith....killing their own children.  It was found to be a technique that polarised opinion AGAINST those Jews that then warranted their extermination.  It required nothing more demanding than the repeated and unsupported allegation where the moral ascendancy could remain with the victimisers who were then permitted to do anything that they required up to and including the outright theft of their property and the intended extermination of that entire People.  In the same way I have variously been accused of supreme ignorance, mendacity, false test representations about our claim, stupidity, mental instability and sundry social eccentricities related to my looks and even to an alleged preference to wearing pygamas in public.  Harti and Poynty et al - have taught you all to disregard my postings and to treat me with the kind of disrespect that would not even be appropriate applied to a criminal - through the simple expediency of denying anything that I write and addressing me in the most abusive of manners.  I am of the opinion that Harti ONLY ever invites me back to the forum to again 'scoff' at the claims - that he ignores or he rejects on grounds that we have comprehensively addressed in every paper that we have ever written.  And while he does not personally engage - ON ANY LEVEL AT ALL - he permits the likes of TK and Fuzzy and a host of willing 'trolls' to do his dirty work.

This flaunted disrespect includes but is in no way limited by nor confined to a denial of the significance of an oscillation that defies any known explanation within the standard model.  I won't here go into the history of this related to that replication fiasco.  It would take too long.  I have worked TIRELESSLY and at my OWN EXPENSE to promote this knowledge related to switching circuits that were PREDICTED in terms of a modest thesis based on a revision of Faraday's Lines of Force.   I am widely accused on doing NOTHING but furthering a THEORY where  I REPEATEDLY advise that I have none.  Nor do any of us.  We have ONLY referred to the standard model. YET I am accused of 'self promotion'.

All of which has inclined the most of our members to IGNORE my comments outside of my own thread - and to apply a level of scorn and contempt in their address of me in my own thread that - at its KINDEST can be construed as a BREACH of forum guidelines.  And instead of applying the required checks Harti positively encourages input that will DETRACT from the claim and DIMINISH the results.  And his ONLY excuse to do this is IF he can claim that there are measurement errors.  Which is WHY he REPEATEDLY advises you all that there ARE measurement errors.  The final and insufferable evidence is here again - where he asks LUC to check our results off a 555 timer where we ALREADY HAVE THESE RESULTS which we have done and MADE PUBLIC.  Meanwhile the ABUSE continues off forum and  I do not have the option of starting a new thread to address this abuse. 

And FINALLY.  We have engaged Poynt.99 AND Professor Steven E Jones in our rights to do a test that would represent conclusive proof of our over unity claim - where we would otherwise qualify for their prize. And that challenge is IGNORED.  And the joke of it is this.  I didn't DARE include Harti in that challenge because then I KNEW that he'd have locked my thread much sooner than he did.   But frankly - RIGHT NOW - I propose that this post can be a challenge to him as well.  For some reason - that I cannot understand - it seems critically important that OUR CLAIM - more than any other - IS DENIED.  AND I PUT IT TO YOU ALL IT IS BECAUSE WE HAVE THE THESIS THAT SUPPORTS THAT CLAIM.  Once that is understood - then you guys will KNOW how to do your own fishing.  AND that will FINALLY put paid to any CHANCE of EXPLOITATION by ANY MONOPOLIST EVER AGAIN.  Frankly, I'm not sure that this sits comfortably with the intentions of these forums.  Which is the ONLY possible explanation for this inappropriate response to our claim.  For some reason the 'lead out lead in theory' - the radiant energy theories - all those ill defined and inexplicable explanations are preferred OVER our simple evidence that uses nothing more exotic than INDUCTIVE LAWS.

All of which is ONLY my considered opinion.  But - unhappily - it's also the only way to make sense of this EXTRAORDINARY attack that our technology warrants.  I'm not at all sure how long this post will be allowed to stay here.  I'm copying it and also putting it on my blog.  I'll post a link hereafter.  If you lose it then just google Rosemary Ainslie.  It's there.  Together with that HATE BLOG against me which is heavily subscribed to not only by Poynty and Laurel  among others - but by someone called MOOKIE who works for ESKOM - our local utility suppliers who are also proposing to EXPAND their nuclear facilities.  Go figger.

Regards,
Rosemary

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

[FatBird]

Rosemary,  Please post the link to your Blog.

Thank you for your good posts here.

.