Testing the TK Tar Baby

[picowatt]

She's a brick wall!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR5ApYxkU-U

Dark sarcasm and DOOM!   

All in all...

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And Guys, girls, readers

Picowatt is equally anxious to misinform you and relies on the misrepresentation of the voltage across the transistor - to carry his rather thin argument.  I'm entirely satisfied that those of you who are familiar with a LeCroy are well able to understand the significance of the coupling. 

Again, I would caution you all.  Sadly he's admitted understanding this significance.  And.  Notwithstanding.  He's assuming that you are all that STUPID that you yourselves - do NOT understand it.  And equally sadly - he has nothing else go complain about.  And like our little TK he can only manage to regurgitate the same rather sick nonsense over and over.  He is doing his best to misinform you all.  Make allowances for the repetitive nature of those presentations.  He's either excessively compromised by his own lack of intellect or he's relying on your own.  Probably the latter.  And there is nothing else that he can find to cast the doubt that he's trying to promote.

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary

[MileHigh]

I'm entirely satisfied that those of you who are familiar with a LeCroy are well able to understand the significance of the coupling.

Absolutely!

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Absolutely!

Thanks for the endorsement MileHigh.

Rosie Posie

[picowatt]

And Guys, girls, readers

Picowatt is equally anxious to misinform you and relies on the misrepresentation of the voltage across the transistor - to carry his rather thin argument.  I'm entirely satisfied that those of you who are familiar with a LeCroy are well able to understand the significance of the coupling. 

Again, I would caution you all.  Sadly he's admitted understanding this significance.  And.  Notwithstanding.  He's assuming that you are all that STUPID that you yourselves - do NOT understand it.  Sadly - he has nothing else go complain about.  And like our little TK he can only manage to regurgitate the same rather sick nonsense over and over.  He is doing his best to misinform you all.  Make allowances for the repetitive nature of those presentations.  He's either excessively compromised by his own lack of intellect or he's relying on your own.  Probably the latter.  And there is nothing else that he can find to cast the doubt that he's trying to promote.

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary

Your AC coupling argument is totally rdiculous at best.  You merely demonstrate to everyone how limited your skills are with regard to using an oscilloscope.

You only destroy your credibility further with every post that argues that +12 volts is not being applied to the gate of Q1 during the positive portion of the FG cycle in FIG 3.  This question regarding Q1 was asked several months ago and to date no reasonable explanation has been provided by you, merely arguments over the indicated Q1 gate drive level. 

So, when you finally realize how ridiculous your AC coupling argument is, and that +12 volts is indeed being applied to the gate of Q1 in FIG3, maybe you will get around to answering my question:

Why is Q1 not turnng on in FIG3 and FIG7 during the positive portion of the FG cycle wherein sufficient gate drive is indicated to turn Q1 fully on?  No current flow is indicated by the CSR trace in those figures as would be expected if Q1 were being turned on.


ADDED:  And for the record, I am not trying to "promote" anything, I HAVE been trying to get an answer for 3 months or so however.