Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie, you are really overstepping the boundaries. I am preserving these libels for all and sundry to see. Beware: anyone who gets involved with Rosemary Ainslie, the ultimate paranoid deluded lying internet troll, will eventually experience her bitter bile and libels.

[poynt99]

From Rosemary's sandbox:

Meanwhile - as mentioned - we've all of us learned to keep our numbers OUT of the public eye.  This will only change when we FINALLY get accreditation that is well supported by industry - and by the press.  Which is where our efforts are currently directed.

One must be optimistic and expect Rosemary to adhere to her own self-imposed conditions. If she does, her latest nonsense will never be seen in public. Why? Because it is extremely unlikely that any accredited engineer would give her "work" his stamp of approval, i.e. that they would endorse her ridiculous claims or erroneous measurements.

Good on you Rosemary! This is definitely a VERY good thing for the FE community at large.

[TinselKoala]

The woman is a parody of herself.

Her defence being the "veracity of her numbers".... what an amazing joke! I have preserved in my database MANY of Ainslie's little "veracity with numbers" games: her whacky arithmetic errors that show how little attention she paid in school; the insane calculations based on assumptions gone awry and mistaken conceptions of power and energy units; the absurd claims without any reality checking at all like the claim to have dissipated 5.9 megaJoules in 90 minutes, or boiling water when no water was boiled, and many more.
Perhaps she refers to the "negative wattage" that is so easy to measure when the measurement is done improperly. Well.... if that is newsworthy, then my and .99's Altoid circuit is headline news since it makes the same negative wattage and needs NO BATTERY AT ALL to run, powering a load and making all the negative wattage one cares to measure. As has been explained to her many times in many ways, her negative mean power measurement is well understood, it DOES NOT INVOLVE INJECTION OF HEFTY WATTS FROM A FUNCTION GENERATOR as the continuously lying Ainslie now claims, and means only that her measurements are not measuring what she claims, and evidently believes, that they are measuring. After all...... the exact same waveforms that produce Ainslie's erroneous measurements have been produced in MANY SYSTEMS THAT DO NOT INVOLVE FGs AT ALL, like Altoid, like Tar Baby with DC bias drive, TB with several different 555 timer drives, and in .99's sims. Ainslie simply lies here, to her newcomer AlienSigns and to all who read her forum. See the excerpt from an exceptionally mendacious post of hers, below.

Not only that, but I have also saved plenty of proofs that she has indeed claimed a bit more than just "measurements". She entered her absurd kludge of a circuit into the running for three different Overunity Prizes, remember? Monetary prizes, based on her claim of overunity performance. Not just some anomalous measurements that needed to be explained. COP > INFINITY.... remember that? I sure do, even if the Red Queen Ainslie, Little Miss Mendacious Mosfet, doesn't.

I fervently hope that Brian Little, whoever he is, gets wind of the insane abuses and ridiculous claims and libels coming from this vile and bilious Ainslie wench, and does take the kind of action that the madwoman so ardently seeks.

[mrsean2k]

Are "allegations " of homosexuality a common way of attempting to undermine people in South Africa? Im clearly out of touch, but I can scarcely believe anyone believes its a facet of someones personality that's worth mentioning.

And Rosemary; you have my contact details; I have a large publicly available gallery of screenshots of your risible experimentation, and I state that you're a fool, a fraud, and a liar.

Now what have your legal team got for me, love?

[TinselKoala]

She can't even keep her own story straight, as we've known for some time. In a post earlier she "claims" that she hasn't claimed anything beyond some _measurements_ that need explaining. But here she claims very clearly to have proof of exceeding the "unity barrier". Where is this proof? There isn't any. Even her own data, as shown in her own scopeshots, show that her claims are false.

Isn't it interesting, in the face of her accusations, that the Truth is that WE are the ones who made her scopeshot data available in one place, that WE are the ones who pointed out the various errors in her mendacious daft manuscripts, that WE are the ones who publicly discuss and post our data and research for all to see without restriction...... that WE have publicly replicated and reported on all of Ainslie's measurements and WE have explained them IN PUBLIC FOR ALL TO SEE and to reproduce at will...

While on the other hand, Ainslie has lied, concealed, obfuscated, selected, hidden and falsified, and even today refuses to share her data publicly.... and has missed her own deadlines for public posting of test results many times..... yet she has the overweening arrogance and lying mendacity to assert that it is WE who are trying to "keep AWAY from public knowledge" anything about Ainslie's fiasco of prevarication and delusion. It is Yet another Ains-lie that is easily proven wrong by a simple search through her own posts.