Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 162 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Golly. That is not how you explained it before, though, is it. AND... you threaten me again with your legal fictions because I POST A SCOPE SHOT WITH CORRECT NUMBERS ON IT? You are insane. And that is an opinion from a qualified psychologist.

@.99: Note where the cursors are positioned. Are you getting valid "cycle mean" and "mean" values in the boxes?If so, why are they so different?

Rosemary Ainslie

And Guys - regarding this post....
Quote from: TinselKoala on May 16, 2012, 08:20:29 PM
That is more like it. Are you beginning to feel the heat now?

But....where did you get the 0.179 A from?  The voltage drop across the CVR when it is manifestly carrying current is 1.25 A. But in the "oscillations" it is ... what? The average of the "fuzz" is just below the zero baseline.

I am not concerned with numbers in boxes. They are not accurate because of the way the scope is being used.
Read the scope traces please-- they are accurate, if not as precise as the boxed numbers.
How can you justify the 0.179 A figure? 

Also don't forget the inductive reactance at 1.5 MHz... the resistor is not 0.25 Ohms for that frequency. BUT that is just why I suggested leaving the oscs out of the picture altogther FOR NOW. Do they COOL the load?
The highlighted comment is slanderous.  There is NO WAY that the LeCroy can be used other than to accurately record voltages.  This ALLEGATION of 'misuse' is SLANDEROUS.  In other words it cannot be PROVED.  And it is, in any event 'IMPOSSIBLE'. 

I will be notifying Stefan to apply some rather hefty editing. 

Regards,
Rosemary

TinselKoala

Golly.
Is it possible that Ainslie omitted data from her report, because it was embarrassing to her?

Yep.

Rosemary Ainslie

TK - you have now gone WAY TOO FAR.

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 16, 2012, 08:25:42 PM
Golly. That is not how you explained it before, though, is it. AND... you threaten me again with your legal fictions because I POST A SCOPE SHOT WITH CORRECT NUMBERS ON IT? You are insane. And that is an opinion from a qualified psychologist.

@.99: Note where the cursors are positioned. Are you getting valid "cycle mean" and "mean" values in the boxes?If so, why are they so different?
And I do not THREATEN to take legal action.  I PROMISE you this.

Rosie Pose

TinselKoala

Preserved as evidence. Once again you threaten me.

The TRUTH is an absolute defense, Ainslie, and I am telling the truth. YOU ARE NOT.

Go ask Stefan whatever you want. He knows how to read a scope trace and how to do simple math.