Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Magluvin]

Yes it's hard to believe.  If you push 10 quarters in at one end then DOWN THAT LINE ten quarters need to be replaced - one, by one, by one.  No other way to complete that journey.  And that speed is NOT at light speed.  It is measurably SLOWER.  That's NOT my argument.  That's our EXPERTS.  And they really do know how to measure this. So.  If you choose to believe this - then, frankly, you're on your own.  But feel free.  No-one is prescribing beliefs.  It's just that belief has nothing to do with science.
YES INDEED.  We've measured it in both our COP>17 tests and in our NERD circuits.  And we've reconciled it with the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron.  We've argued it as a field - and we've used self-consistent arguments THROUGHOUT.

added
Here's the multiple proof...
It reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron
It reconciles the Casimir effect
It reconciles the gravitational force
It answers to the requirement of missing matter measured by our astrophysicists
It conforms to the non-standard properties of the Higgs Boson
It reconciles all the forces
It conforms to known physical principles
It conforms the composite structure proposed in the protons
It introduces the concept of a fundamental particle as the basis of all particles.

That's not a bad start.

Rosie

The tube from me to you is full of quarters, full. I push 10 extra quarters in my end and 10 quarters will fall out your end. But you dont have the actual quarters that I pushed into my end. You have the 10 quarters that were sitting in your end of the tube, because the tube is full.

So our cable from NY to Cali is full of copper. Electrons are more free to break their bonds in conductive materials.   A capacitors plates can be pumped with more electrons than the metal plate normally has at neutral charge, and the plate can be depleted of electrons, less than the metal plates normal holdings.

That cable from NY to Cali, I could pump extra electrons in the cable, even though the Cali end of the cable is disconnected. Not connected to anything. Now the cable has a static negative charge. After I pump the charge in at the NY end and disconnect, then the people at the Cali end can hook up and use that charge, whenever they decide to do so. However large the charge is, what ever I am able to put in, that is what will be available to the end user in Cali. Even if its just a pip, or a static zap.

When I pump the electrons in at the NY end, and the Cali end is not connected yet, we are cramming more electrons into the copper cable than it normally would have at neutral charge. This creates tension, pressure. These electrons dont like room mates, they like to live alone. They will take any hole they can jump to to get away from a room mate electron. If we introduce 500 extra electrons, we are forcing room mate ism. The 500 move in to other electrons apartments and then some of the original apartment dwellers move on to live with someone else, and so on and so on till those 500 extra electrons have created so much change in the cable, that there are 500 room mated apartments somewhere along that cable, spread out relatively evenly from one end of the cable to the other. This still creates tension and pressure, untill there is a release by making a connection at either end.

You do believe in static charge dont you Rose? Do you believe we can pump extra electrons into the open ended cable, as a static charge? And do you believe that we can extract that static charge from the cable at a later time? Like rubbing shoes on carpet and later discharging with the touch of a finger to a metal desk or pipe.

So if I pump those 500 electrons into the cable as a static charge, where are my 500 electrons exactly? Are they near the input end of the cable, or at the Cali end of the cable?

Have you ever seen an Avramenko Plug circuit?  It pumps one side of a capacitor at a time. Pumpin in 1 plate, then pumping out of the other in opposing cycles of AC.
Input is 1 wire from a secondary of a transformer, and we can charge a cap, 1 wire in.

Ive done it. I use 1 wire from a secondary of a tiny 1kv neon transformer, into a 2 diode AV plug and charge a cap, vi 1 wire, HV ac, 1 side of the cap at a time, depending on the neg or pos cycle of the AC.


MaGs

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The tube from me to you is full of quarters, full. I push 10 extra quarters in my end and 10 quarters will fall out your end. But you dont have the actual quarters that I pushed into my end. You have the 10 quarters that were sitting in your end of the tube, because the tube is full.

So our cable from NY to Cali is full of copper. Electrons are more free to break their bonds in conductive materials.   A capacitors plates can be pumped with more electrons than the metal plate normally has at neutral charge, and the plate can be depleted of electrons, less than the metal plates normal holdings.

That cable from NY to Cali, I could pump extra electrons in the cable, even though the Cali end of the cable is disconnected. Not connected to anything. Now the cable has a static negative charge. After I pump the charge in at the NY end and disconnect, then the people at the Cali end can hook up and use that charge, whenever they decide to do so. However large the charge is, what ever I am able to put in, that is what will be available to the end user in Cali. Even if its just a pip, or a static zap.

When I pump the electrons in at the NY end, and the Cali end is not connected yet, we are cramming more electrons into the copper cable than it normally would have at neutral charge. This creates tension, pressure. These electrons dont like room mates, they like to live alone. They will take any hole they can jump to to get away from a room mate electron. If we introduce 500 extra electrons, we are forcing room mate ism. The 500 move in to other electrons apartments and then some of the original apartment dwellers move on to live with someone else, and so on and so on till those 500 extra electrons have created so much change in the cable, that there are 500 room mated apartments somewhere along that cable, spread out relatively evenly from one end of the cable to the other. This still creates tension and pressure, untill there is a release by making a connection at either end.

You do believe in static charge dont you Rose? Do you believe we can pump extra electrons into the open ended cable, as a static charge? And do you believe that we can extract that static charge from the cable at a later time? Like rubbing shoes on carpet and later discharging with the touch of a finger to a metal desk or pipe.

So if I pump those 500 electrons into the cable as a static charge, where are my 500 electrons exactly? Are they near the input end of the cable, or at the Cali end of the cable?

Have you ever seen an Avramenko Plug circuit?  It pumps one side of a capacitor at a time. Pumpin in 1 plate, then pumping out of the other in opposing cycles of AC.
Input is 1 wire from a secondary of a transformer, and we can charge a cap, 1 wire in.

Ive done it. I use 1 wire from a secondary of a tiny 1kv neon transformer, into a 2 diode AV plug and charge a cap, vi 1 wire, HV ac, 1 side of the cap at a time, depending on the neg or pos cycle of the AC.


MaGs

Mags you'll need to argue this with our academics.  If you're onto something then I'm sure they'll be delighted.  They're all looking for an explanation. 

Rosie

[TinselKoala]

Actually there's more...

It reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron
It reconciles the Casimir effect
It reconciles the gravitational force
It answers to the requirement of missing matter measured by our astrophysicists
It conforms to the non-standard properties of the Higgs Boson
It reconciles all the forces
It conforms to known physical principles
It conforms to the composite structure proposed in the protons
It introduces the concept of a fundamental particle as the basis of all particles as required by our particle physicists
It conforms IN WHOLE AND IN PART to the requirement of our string theorists.
It conforms to Faraday's Lines of Force

Rosie

NOT actually,  Ainslie. Your "thesis" does none of these things. NONE.

IN fact... it cannot even "reconcile" or explain the simple phenomena that I  illustrate in my videos. Think of how nice it would feel and how you could crow... if only you could explain the VDG oil jet video...or even the simple operation of a Van De Graaff machine using your silly "thesis". But you cannot. On the other hand using QED one can precisely predict and successfully measure VDG voltages and currents based on materials used and belt speeds and size of capacity.

[TinselKoala]

Yeah, Mags... .they are all looking for an explanation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj5T0zRALKc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLkgGkEzk0c

[Magluvin]

Yeah, Mags... .they are all looking for an explanation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj5T0zRALKc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLkgGkEzk0c

Yeah, he invented that in 1929. Did they burn all the old books in colleges?

MaGs