quentron.com

[MarkE]

Textbook-compatible means you can take a textbook and check if you see a flaw in my statement @markE.you won't find one aside from a 2lot violation.you don't need a citation.what you need is to see if you can physically disprove my statement.or theoretically if you wish.

No citation is no citation.  You promised such a citation and never delivered.  What is ordinary and already accepted as proven does not need to be reproven.  It is extraordinary claims that challenge what is ordinary and accepted that requires proof.  The burden of that proof falls on those who make the extraordinary claims.  If you can and want to meet that burden then the choice to do so is yours.  If you don't whether because you can't or you don't want to then your extraordinary claims carry no weight.

[profitis]

A mirror takes the form of mirror thus is limited to a mirrors needs @memoryman.a 2lot violation can creep up in any one of a number of systems(magetic,electromagnetic,electrochemical etc)thus you cannot with any certainty even use the words 'may not.'you'd be surprized what research is going on behind corporate scenes nowdays.if you never saw a 2lot violator on the shelves it is probably because it has been shelved(corporate competition leverage).if you look carefully you,l see more subtle forms of 2lot violators creeping on2 the markets eg certain solar systems,coolers,water heaters etc that are way more efficient than they're supposed to be.

[profitis]

@markE the weight of my extra-ordinary claim sir,lies in the fact that you,as a scientist,cannot physically nor mentally counter my extra-ordinary claim.as simple as that.the last scientific statement that I made in this thread still stands,unchallenged.a practical scientific statement is not proof.its the inability of anyone to counter it that pushes it over the proof line.

[MarkE]

@markE the weight of my extra-ordinary claim sir,lies in the fact that you,as a scientist,cannot physically nor mentally counter my extra-ordinary claim.as simple as that.the last scientific statement that I made in this thread still stands,unchallenged.

We have been through this many times before.  If you suffer the delusion that it is up to others to prove the ordinary, then you are sadly mistaken.

[profitis]

Its their choice @markE.if they don't take my statement up for the challenge I gues they'l never know,or want to know.