quentron.com

Madebymonkeys · December 22, 2012, 01:09:21 AM

Quote from: doublehelix on December 22, 2012, 12:57:52 AM
OK, You take the side of YES Quenco is True, and I will debate that it is FALSE

Actually, I wanted false...

doublehelix · December 22, 2012, 01:24:30 AM

So you did not actually want a debate, you just wanted to tell everyone that you do not think Phil is right and that you know better.

Go ahead and tell us in detail where he is wrong and what you know to be the correct position (without reference to the historical position on the matter). I see he has posted quite a bit on his theory page that you must be very keen to correct, though why you are waiting for a debate on the matter to do that is a mystery to me.

doublehelix · December 22, 2012, 01:30:19 AM

If you make sense I will reply in the contrary position, if I can.

Madebymonkeys · December 22, 2012, 02:59:03 AM

Quote from: doublehelix on December 22, 2012, 01:24:30 AM
So you did not actually want a debate, you just wanted to tell everyone that you do not think Phil is right and that you know better.

Not at all, all I have been asking for since I joined is some answers to some basic questions and some proof that his claims are true. Asking questions and asking for proof appears to get people on the defensive (you included by the looks of it).....and gets the questions asker branded a troll!

I haven't made the claims that Quenco works 100%, is totally proven, will change the world etc - PJH has. It's down to him to provide some proof of his claims if he wants to retain credibility.

This is scheduled to happen in Feb 2013 (this time) - PJH has managed my expectations such that I don't believe this will happen.

Can you explain, unambiguously, why it will or won't work?

doublehelix · December 22, 2012, 03:06:29 AM

Quote from: Madebymonkeys on December 19, 2012, 03:30:54 PM
How about we keep the topic on the subject of why this wont work (or even, why it will).
Lots of talk right now about it working and 'believe in PJH' but no sane reason why it will work! Lots of reasons why it won't.

How about a debate?!

You asked for a debate on science, I thought, but apparently you want to hold the debate about why PJH should be believed if he fails to meet your imposed deadline.

You have the floor to post here why his device will not work, so go ahead. Arguments that it will not work because he did not meet a timetable are just stupid and look like trolling. You asked for a debate on the subject, shame you do not do what you asked for.