quentron.com

[profitis]

Yes i mean by the large grand population of electrochemists man.why do you think i keep asking you to bring one such an expert onboard and why do you keep stalling with that too? Now show me a textbook that discusses an wikipedia-type equal pressure oxygen concentration cell @sarkeizen.cmon,show me.. And while your at it,show me a discussion about bismuth electrode concentration cells,or bromine electrode concentration cells..or germanium electrode concentration cells..or iodine electrode concentration cells..very hard or impossible to find,does that mean they dont exist? The nernst formula is infallible @sarkeizen,it applies to all concentration cells.

[sarkeizen]

Yes i mean by the large grand population of electrochemists

Then it should be no problem to find a textbook which clearly states: "Here's how you make a battery that will run a small device continually and eternally?" or "Here's when you should use an eternal battery design over a non-eternal one." or really any discussion that clearly talks about batteries which can power a device continuously and eternally like they were a real thing.

You can't, so that alone means that this line of discussion where you fantasize about how most electrochemists agree with you can't make your point about textbooks.  So it's irrelevant.

very hard or impossible to find,does that mean they dont exist?

It doesn't mean that they do either and if these are the only examples of a text which makes your point.  Then....


You have just conceded the argument.


Congratulations!!!! You lost and it only took you three months to realize what was clear to anybody with high-school logic in the first few posts.

Also thank you for providing a new lower bound for "stupid people I have met on the internet".

Of course...if these examples which you clearly just googled and sort of fabricated or deluded a connection between them and your own ideas.  If these AREN'T the only way to make your point.  Then they are - yet another - dodge.  Yawn.

The nernst formula is infallible

See this is where I think you are just purely trolling, such a monumental level of ignorance about how physical formulae are derived is crazy.

[profitis]

lol @sarkeizen.you only win when you show a disconnection to the textbooks between a equal-pressure gaseous electrode concentration cell and the average college chem textbook.use jennifer lopez equation if you want,just find a spot for kelvin rule..

[sarkeizen]

lol @sarkeizen.you only win when

You can't support your statement from an ordinary textbook.  That's the only statement I'm arguing.  Any other argument is simply your own delusion.

So again, are you saying you can't support your "eternal continuous ipod battery" from an ordinary textbook?  If you can, please do so...if not please give me some dodge, evasion, demand to build, demand to provide a proof of something I didn't say, demand to provide some member of the scientific community to speak...as a means of letting me know that you concede the point.

Take your time.

[profitis]

@sarkeizen.cycle 1 (on): compression of gas satisfies electrochemical entropy at expense of temperature entropy.cycle 2 (off): decompression of gas in line with temperature entropy. How is this concentration cell cycle incompatible with rules of college textbooks.theres zero incompatibility.zero incompatibility means we can use a college textbook to predict this repeatable cycle.