Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Eds design

Started by Thaelin, April 12, 2005, 10:32:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

sevenmead

I believe Ed's motor worked.  He was on the scene long enough to indicate this.  I think alot of his problems came from the lack of knowledge as to how his machine actually worked.  But this was also a blessing.  Stating that his motor was actually a high efficiency design (99% efficiant)  was probably what enabled him to get a patent.  If he has stated his motor ran off the cosmos, he would have been denied. 

The key here (opinion) is in the power supply.  I got the feeling the motor was just designed to run off the specific pulse signature produced by Ed's power supply.  There fore, it is of little importants until the power supply is developed. 

Has anyone else noticed the similarities between the Ed Gray power supply, Tesla's magnifying transmitter, Moray's device.  Tesla's is the most simple becuase he was broadcasting the radiant energy and there wasn't much discussion about recieving it.  Ed's design takes this to a new level by including the recieving protion in his design so effectively he was only broadcasting his radiant energy across his tube.  The Moray design is the best in my opinion.  He has all the components that appear in Tesla and Gray's designs but with the added complexity that comes with making his circuit occilate instead just pulsed DC.  I think the confusion comes from Moray's "fission material" which is probably helpful and makes the circuit simpler, but I believe a hybrid between the three can be made with out the need for the "detector" substance.

any thoughts?
Freedom is a fundamental property of the universe.  Lack of freedom indicates tampering.

tpslsmn

THE MORE I STUDY,THE MORE SIMILARITIES I SEE IN ALL THE ABOVE DEVICES- INCLUDING FLOYD SWEET. COLD ELECTRICITY, ARGONNE, NEGETIVE ENERGY ALL
SEEM TO BE THE 'TRUE PRODUCT'  OF OVERUNITY DEVICES. I ALSO BELIEVE ED'S
MOTOR WORKED. THERE ALSO SEEMS TO BE A COMMON PROBLEM WITH CONSISTENCY OF PERFORMANCE IN MOST OF THESE DEVICES.
HOW DO YOU MEASURE COLD ELECTRICITY OR NEGETIVE ENERGY? IT HAS TO COME
FROM SOMEWHERE. OU DEVICES MUST CREATE AN IMBALANCE TO WORK. IF YOU WERE SURROUNDED BY OU DEVICES, WOULD YOU FEEL ENERGY BEING DRAWN FROM
YOU? THE MORE I THINK ABOUT, IT SEEMS ACHEIVING 'PLAIN UNITY' WOULD BE A
GREAT ACCOMPLISHMENT. THERE IS SO MUCH FREE POWER IN THE SUN ALREADY.
      OK, I'LL GET OFF MY SOAP BOX.    HOWEVER... LET'S ALL GET OFF THE GRID!

               - MARK

jwrigley

Hi Mark,

   the skeptic in all of us comes out...and it should. But I believe as you that there are common threads between many of the articles on the web and books to be purchased. If you have not read Moray King's lastest work regarding potential ZPE harnessing, I would suggest you do. Also Peter Lindemann's book, "the sectrets of cold electricity." Lately, I have read Bruce A. Perreault's book as well, "Harnessing Cosmic Energy." I've compiled a little reference library which I constantly refer to. Also books on theory can be useful as well, Milo Wolff, "Exploring the Unknown universe." What I've tried to do is gather in as much information as possible, reread, and cross-reference, without becoming to skeptical at first. A basic understanding of presently established scientific theory (I believe) is a must. It's the underpinnings of these theory's that seem to be in question (for example. what is a photon?). These are not just philosophical questions but may have real world applications. Most of all though, is not to go spouting theory until you have done your own homework and experimentation. This, in my humble opinion, is how best not to waste other people's time.

-John   

iald

Hi Guy's

Pls check if there we can get idea at web ismaelaviso.com a motor running with 0.53amps only for 2ho & 2000rpm, somebody told me that is EV GRAY version, 9 stator and 3 rotor coils. The power supply was a FYMEGM energy, do you know about this ? This is the first time i saw a video motor running with less amps. How about Lutec, Muller, Newman etc.. do you know if they have this kind of footage of their motor ? I want to build one but i  dont know where to start and  i dont know where i will get the idea.

iald


sevenmead

I get the feeling the whole point in Cold electricity is ZERO amps.
Freedom is a fundamental property of the universe.  Lack of freedom indicates tampering.