A truly interesting transformer overunity concept

[Qwert]

Hi. On this new thread one of you said that he was looking for an answer in some sources. Did you see William Beatty's site http://amasci.com ? Here's one possibility: http://amasci.com/elect/poynt/poynt.html
and another one
http://amasci.com/elect/mcoils.html

[Farmhand]

Maybe this document will help.  http://sound.westhost.com/xfmr.htm

I think adding the core will only concentrate the flux and increase the magnetic flux density
but will not increase the amount of magnetic flux, I'm not sure if will effectively increase the
magnetic field strength, I guess it will  but the field would be more concentrated I guess. (smaller less area)
Then there is flux linkage ect. From what I can deduce adding a core will not increase the magnetic flux itself ( the amount of magnetism)

2.   Magnetic Core Terminology
This list is far from complete, but will be sufficient to either get you started or scare you away. I have included the symbols and units of only three of the entries below, since most are of no real interest.

Coercivity - is the field strength which must be applied to reduce (or coerce) the remanent flux to zero. Materials with high coercivity (e.g. those used for permanent magnets) are called hard. Materials with low coercivity (those used for transformers) are called soft.

Effective Area - of a core is the cross sectional area of the centre limb for E-I laminations, or the total area for a toroid. Usually this corresponds to the physical dimensions of the core but because flux may not be distributed evenly the manufacturer may specify a value which reflects this.

Effective length - of a core is the distance which the magnetic flux travels in making a complete circuit. Usually this corresponds closely to the average of the physical dimensions of the core, but because flux has a tendency to concentrate on the inside corners of the path the manufacturer may specify a value for the effective length.

Flux Density - (symbol; B, unit; Teslas (T)) is simply the total flux divided by the effective area of the magnetic circuit through which it flows.

Flux linkage - in an ideal inductor the flux generated by one turn would be contained within all the other turns. Real coils come close to this ideal when the other dimensions of the coil are small compared with its diameter, or if a suitable core guides the flux through the windings.

Magnetomotive Force - MMF can be thought of as the magnetic equivalent of electromotive force. It is the product of the current flowing in a coil and the number of turns that make up the coil.

Magnetic Field Strength - (symbol: H, unit; ampere metres (A m-1)) when current flows in a conductor, it is always accompanied by a magnetic field. The strength, or intensity, of this field is proportional to the amount of current and inversely proportional to the distance from the conductor (hence the -1 superscript).

Magnetic Flux - (symbol: ; unit: Webers (Wb)) we refer to magnetism in terms of lines of force or flux, which is a measure of the total amount of magnetism.

Permeability - (symbol; µ, units: henrys per metre (Hm-1) is defined as the ratio of flux density to field strength, and is determined by the type of material within the magnetic field - i.e. the core material itself. Most references to permeability are actually to "relative permeability", as the permeability of nearly all materials changes depending upon field strength (and in most cases with temperature as well).

Remanence - (or remnance) is the flux density which remains in a magnetic material when the externally applied field is removed. Transformers require the lowest possible remanence, while permanent magnets need a high value of remanence.

Cheers

[Tito L. Oracion]

I dont understand why people are seeing that the "MEG" has some potential while not  seeing that a traditional iron core electromagnet is also having  some phenomenal  potential as well (if you want to see it that way).  Let me explain, The whole concept of flynn/Radus MEG is that you turn off the magnetpower with a power seemingly  less than  that of the magnet itself. in the case of FLynn the  total force is 3700grams   from which is 1100 grams  that you pay for coming from an electromagnet. so you are using 1/3 of the power  to  gate the magnetic flux which seems to be a key to overunity. I thought it to be  the final key to overunity until  a extremely simple thought hit me: an  iron electromagnet is in fact much much more effective..  how? well  for a single simple iron core el.magnet you are also only putting a 1/200th of the  power!!! to power and control the electromagnet. In the flynn MEG you  use 1100grams out of 3800 which is roughly 1/3 of the power..  you see where I am going?

Im not sure if I am absolutely right or  if my   meaning didnt go through, but your explanation to why  my original iron-core-aircore theory wouldnt work SHOULD precisely  apply as well to  the flynn device.

Thanx

Everything has a potential like everyone has a potential, overunity is just an ARRANGEMENT  that's why many overunity device cannot be sold because the arrangement is so easy to copy.


its like a small fire that can become a very big fire.


MEG has a special winding arrangement that's why it can make energy more than input.


now if you want to know free energy then study tesla and all his patents deeply. 
especially those that makes high potential, high current ....

like for example here:
  http://amasci.com/elect/mcoils.html


if you add coils to other part of the core of the Transformer is not the way to overunity but to boost it first then collect. 
and that is the way!

[Newton II]

Hi everyone.

I have an idea and wonder why no body even thought about it, and I would love to know why it wouldnt work:

We all know  that a certain air-core coil at a given current will produce a certain magnetic field
take that same coil and  put an iron inside it and you will amplify the magnetic field 100 to  1000s of times... FOR THE SAME  INPUT CURRENT!!!

You are forgetting the reverse of it.    If you put iron inside air core,  it will definitely  amplify the magnetic field 100 to 1000 times.  But reversely  it also means that you should have variation of 100 to 1000 times flux  to produce the given current in the same core.   If you remove iron materials from the coils of a normal generator and rotate the magnetic poles infront of air cores,  will it generate same electricity as a normal generator?   IT will not.   Flux of the magnet has to amplified 100 to 1000 times using iron materials to get normal elecricity production.

I think Fatbirds answer is right.   From air core you will not get anything.



 

[Paul-R]

and you will amplify the magnetic field 100 to  1000s of times... FOR THE SAME  INPUT CURRENT!!!

I don't think so. Surely the current to "fill" the iron cored coil will be greater.