Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

  What I am getting better at is winding this Kacher's secondary coil. I just rewound it again, taking out a few more yards of the  mag wire, and further spanning out all the turns.  Going for 2.4Mhz.  We'll see.  I'm connecting it back up now.
    Since it's very important to get this secondary wound just right, as any touching of one wire turn to the next one changes things.
 
   What makes doing the math easier for me right now, is keeping the scope setting the same each time, until I get the hang of it.
I also know about more waves peaks on the screen making for a more accurate readings. And, I'll do that, also.
  More shots soon.

[NickZ]

  Here's my latest Kacher secondary coil re-wind, with a few less turns, and more spacing spread.
  Scope is on the same setting as before, .5us/Div. I count about 5 .1us sections. For 2Mhz,  correct?
If it's more like 4.5 us then it would be back to the 2.2Mhz, so it something like in that range. I may remove more turns to get it up to 2.4Mhz, if possible.  Opinion?
  Second shot is of the same thing, but using 2 sec/Div setting, and Vol/Div setting a the 10x probe setting on 2, for higher accuracy.
  I'm still obtaining a fairly good output to the CFL bulb, and it lights to about 11 inches away from the antenna.
  Sorry for the blurry pictures, I'll do better next time.
   
   For the First Time, there is an increase in gain, when the Kacher is activated, which can also be observed on the scope, and a corresponding brighter output at the bulbs. Still not much additional brightness on the bulb, but, it's a start, like seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.

[TinselKoala]

@Nick:

The second image isn't really useful. One must be able to see the entire waveform easily (peak locations, zero crossings) and not have _too_ many cycles to count easily! (And I doubt that the timebase is set to "2 seconds per division". With a 2 MHz signal at 2 secs per division you would just see a solid band, no cycles would be visible.)

Here's my reading of the first image.

[NickZ]

   TK:
  Ok, thanks again. I think that I've past it this time, and I may need to add some turns back to bring it down to 2.4Mhz. As I'm also seeing less light at the CFL, and no HV stream, only a 1mm spark at the antenna.
  The first of the two last images is .5us/Div like before, and should be correct at 2.5Mhz, or so. 
I'm going to stay at that 0.5us setting for now.
 
   The 24khz signal that my Mazilli is putting out, needs a 1:100 ratio with the Kacher circuit running at 2.4Mhz. And 100khz bandwidth window is all that the Kacher signal can vary, or it won't sync up. At least as I understand it.
 

[TinselKoala]

   TK:
  Ok, thanks again. I think that I've past it this time, and I may need to add some turns back to bring it down to 2.4Mhz. As I'm also seeing less light at the CFL, and no HV stream, only a 1mm spark at the antenna.
  The first of the two last images is .5us/Div like before, and should be correct at 2.5Mhz, or so. 
I'm going to stay at that 0.5us setting for now.
 
   The 24khz signal that my Mazilli is putting out, needs a 1:100 ratio with the Kacher circuit running at 2.4Mhz. And 100khz bandwidth window is all that the Kacher signal can vary, or it won't sync up. At least as I understand it.

If you now slide your ferrite bits into the Kacher core the frequency will decrease, because the inductance increases. You may be in a range now where you can "tune" your Kacher to the frequency you want, by changing the inductance this way, instead of removing/adding turns.