Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 40 Guests are viewing this topic.

Void

Quote from: NickZ on March 31, 2016, 02:26:45 PM
So, why only the closed minded and materially oriented concepts and principles,  accepted?

Hi Nick. I can't comment on anything Verpies and yourself have been discussing, but since
you included me in this reply I will comment that I have not stated or implied a single thing about
not being open to various ideas such as the 'aether' or whatever other ideas in relation to free energy devices.
I have actually made it very clear already that I am quite opened minded in this area. I have only commented
that many things being attributed to Tesla can't actually be backed up when you look at the actual facts. :)
I can't say it any clearer than that. I am already well aware of many if not most of the various ideas that various
people are throwing around in regards to free energy devices, but I prefer to focus on doing my own tests to
see for myself what actually can be put to practical use and what can't. Various unfounded speculations and outright
false statements and the many false attributions to people like Tesla by various people is not really of interest to me. :)

Dog-One

Quote from: Tomtech29 on March 31, 2016, 08:26:10 AM
It is difficult to say how this transformer since no one duplicated ?

What can not be achieved by conventional transformers!

@Tomtech,

The picture you attached looks like it came from a patent application.
Do you have a link to the patent it came from?

I would be very interested to read it.

The reason I ask is because I suspect a similar behavior with that of Nelson's transformer as it appears in the attached image.  The inner flux fields would be the same, only the placement of the coil windings is different--inside on a rod core versus wrapped around the outside of the toroid.

Thanks,


M@

skywalker66

Quote from: Jeg on March 31, 2016, 01:44:07 AM
Hi guys :)
Void, yes i still use the blue box of Allega's to create the synchronized thin pulse. The problem for me is that my yoke doesn't have more space for winding a 40T secondary so to feed with 130V-150V DC my IRFP460. (Which triggers Tesla coil). In addition i don't want to make a second Push pull as Allega did, in a separate yoke core just for that. So what i am testing right now is feeding my Katcher as i told you with a high voltage (200V) kickback out of my mosfet when i drive it with the synchronized pulse. But, two days now i can't start my katcher to oscillate even with continues 24V supply (as Nick). I will try again today. I use a 2sc5200 (Toshiba).

(If someone has any idea on any improvement please feel free to share it)

Hi Jeg !
It may work, depending how you chose your fly-back coil. For getting advantage of your suggested schematic you must choose your fly-back inductance such that it get fully charged (or near the saturation point)  using at most but not more that half of one of push-pull drive pulse by trying which one of them gave aimed amplification effect.
I would charge that fly-back inductance beginning from start point of original pulse up to 47-48% of its duration, because at 50% of push-pull drive pulse happens inductor current to reach its peak, and then you need kacer triggered.  It make sense to you ? Good luck !

Edit: You must keep in mind at 24V supply, voltage across C-E during fly-back pulse of primary kacher reaches at ease 200V. Increasing voltage power supply further, your fly-back primary pulse increase also dangerously for breakdown your kacer transistor. It can exceed easily 1000V.

NickZ

  Void:
   As you had mentioned that you don't think that Tesla has mentioned the Aether as related to any of his works, I thought that I'd post what I found about some of that, which was all in one neat package. And is easier than searching elsewhere.
   In any case if your read it, you'll get the point of the use of non-inductive impulses, and what they are able to do, and why.
That was the point of it all. 

   As you also mentioned, "I have only commented
that many things being attributed to Tesla can't actually be backed up when you look at the actual facts."

   Really?  Like what "things" or facts are you talking about? You mean like, that there's no Aether mentioned in Teslas tests and experiments. That Static is not Radiant, as what Tesla mentioned Radiant to be. 
  You didn't mention any facts, just your opinions.
   I'm not trying to convince you of anything. However, I'm also not convinced of your mentioned opinions about these "things", either. So, I'll leave it at that.
       

Void

Quote from: NickZ on March 31, 2016, 06:55:10 PM
  Void:
   As you had mentioned that you don't think that Tesla has mentioned the Aether as related to any of his works, I thought that I'd post what I found about some of that, which was all in one neat package. And is easier than searching elsewhere.
   In any case if your read it, you'll get the point of the use of non-inductive impulses, and what they are able to do, and why.
That was the point of it all. 
   As you also mentioned, "I have only commented
that many things being attributed to Tesla can't actually be backed up when you look at the actual facts."
   Really?  Like what "things" or facts are you talking about? You mean like, that there's no Aether mentioned in Teslas tests and experiments. That Static is not Radiant, as what Tesla mentioned Radiant to be. 
  You didn't mention any facts, just your opinions.
   I'm not trying to convince you of anything. However, I'm also not convinced of your mentioned opinions about these "things", either. So, I'll leave it at that.

Hi Nick.  I have never said or even suggested that Tesla has never mentioned the aether
in relation to any of his work. You just made that up. :) I believe the concept of the aether was still
in vogue in the late 1800's and early 1900's. I had said that I had not seen Tesla mention the aether in regards
to white corona streamers from spark gaps or from tesla coils in his own writings or statements, and suggested you
check your facts since people attribute all kinds of things to Tesla which he hasn't actually said. I also am well aware
of the concept of using short duration impulses to excite coils, and of coupling to coils capacitively rather than by induction.
This is not a new concept to me. I have been doing lots of experimentation with that sort of thing for several years now. :)

Nick, I have made it clear that I am not interested in discussing this further with you because it is clear to me that
you are not interested in checking your facts. What Bedini or Lindemann or someone else claims about Tesla is of little
interest to me unless they provide proper references to Tesla's own writings or statements. No references, no interest. :)