Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Reiyuki]

HV electrostatic field is  ELECTROSTATIC FIELD if it's a varying over time then its not electrostatic anymore so its wave! we are talking about a moment in which Tesla/Kacher coil stop moving electrons from top to bottom or otherwise, I call it a 0 movement moment - there is no current but only strong electrostatic field lines existing along wire, you have to sync whatever you have with that moment to get boost from static E field if possible.

I really like that explanation, but if a static field by itself was the answer, then we likely would have found this a long time ago with vandegraff generators.  All static but never any current.   So there must be some interaction with the HV static field AND moving current.

I think the answer is quite close to your explanation but with one difference.  If we only apply the HV static offset while there is current flowing, instead of creating an HV plateu it creates a deep pit that allows current to continue flowing; much longer than it normally would have.  Rather than current slowing down it continues to barrel down into the artificial HV sink we created for it.

A resonant circuit has limited ability to store dielectric charge, so by creating this offset we open the door to let current keep flowing.  If we keep that in mind, the Tesla Bifilar winding stuff also starts to make sense.

Attached I think might be the proper area to apply this HV static offset; while current is flowing but decreasing.


Or I'm 100% wrong.  I'm still generating mostly smoke over here so don't consider me a good source on the matter(yet)

[Reiyuki]

double post, my bad.  Can't seem to delete it

[lost_bro]

I really like that explanation, but if a static field by itself was the answer, then we likely would have found this a long time ago with vandegraff generators.  All static but never any current.   So there must be some interaction with the HV static field AND moving current.

I think the answer is quite close to your explanation but with one difference. If we only apply the HV static offset while there is current flowing, instead of creating an HV plateu it creates a deep pit that allows current to continue flowing; much longer than it normally would have.  Rather than current slowing down it continues to barrel down into the artificial HV sink we created for it.

A resonant circuit has limited ability to store dielectric charge, so by creating this offset we open the door to let current keep flowing.  If we keep that in mind, the Tesla Bifilar winding stuff also starts to make sense.

Attached I think might be the proper area to apply this HV static offset; while current is flowing but decreasing.


Or I'm 100% wrong.  I'm still generating mostly smoke over here so don't consider me a good source on the matter(yet)

Good day Reiyuki

You are correct, the current is flowing:  It is flowing in the Grenade/Inductor winding through the Yoke connections.  It is the HV spike from the Karcher/Tesla coil Antenna (third coil) which induces the effects you are taking about.

"Actually the idea that I'm trying to convey would be that of an 'E' field of a HV capacitor (capacitor is integral part of CW & CCW Grenade winding) being spiked at it's apex by the Karcher/Tesla coil's *timed* third coil discharge.  This discharged is *supposedly* timed as PolaczekCebulaczek stated: at the Zero Movement Moment (Current Apex from Yoke coil which flows through the Grenade coil/Inductor combo)."

take care, peace
lost_bro

[Jeg]

Good day Jeg.

Actually I used a resistor in series with the decoupling cap when I was running normal duty cycle range, ie: 10-50%.  On the 3-switch flyback it was a 10 ohm.  On the nano-second pulse GDTs I completely dropped the series resistor and ran only with the cap in series with the primary.

The 10 ohm resistor would start to heat up, it dissipates heat in relation to the operating frequency. I found that this resistor has the same over all effect as the Gate resistor on the secondary side (slew rate), it will slow down the rising and falling edges of your waveform.  This is why I removed it from my nano-pulse circuits, was best just to control the edges by Gate resistor. Of course all this depends on your winding technique and the resulting leakage inductance.

Never had a problem with over-driving my GDT drivers when NOT using the series resistor as long as the cap is in place (without the cap the driver will release it's magic smoke), just a faster signal.  Best way is to scope-it, as each GDT is different likewise it's response will be different.

take care, peace
lost_bro

EDIT: added White Paper;  GDT, XFMR  info.

Thanks bro! I will probably omit it too. Thanks also for the paper!

[Dog-One]

yes yes, and I would like to remind all of you about that contraption http://www.linux-host.org/energy/sgenesis.htm

Let's take this concept a little further, theoretically speaking...

Ask yourself this question, "What is a negative inductor?"

For all practical purposes, I see a negative inductor as a capacitor.

Next, let's suppose we have a coil, that is nearly non-inductive, on the order of just a few nH or pH.
Now apply a high voltage field as described in the link above.
Would we effectively get a capacitor that is on the order of a few nF or pF?
By applying the voltage field, we just turned our inductor into a capacitor.
This opens the door to getting a parametric oscillator if the timing is done correctly.

Above is step one.

Step two.  Let's add a second coil of wire, but this time much more inductive.
Now we have an air-core transformer when no electric field is applied.
When we apply a high voltage field, any inductance is gone on our first coil--now turned into a capacitor.
If the inductance is gone, we no longer have a transformer.
With no transformer, there is no path for back EMF from load to source.

Sure seems reasonable to me (theoretically speaking of course), the grenade coil is
doing just as I have mentioned, with the Tesla secondary voltage field acting as the switch.

The next logical step is to see if we can test this "negative inductor" concept on an
actual grenade coil.  We need to know how much of a field to apply to get it to switch
from an inductor to a capacitor.  If this can be done with real numbers, all the rest is
just engineering.